![]() |
12Re: Comparing entry level detectors to higher end machines: Posted by: Hank68 Date: February 18, 2012 07:37PM | Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 3,033 |
Re: Comparing entry level detectors to higher end machines: Posted by: jmaryt Date: February 18, 2012 10:13PM | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 3,555 |
Re: Comparing entry level detectors to higher end machines: Posted by: jmaryt Date: February 18, 2012 10:23PM | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 3,555 |
Re: Comparing entry level detectors to higher end machines: Posted by: kai_gold Date: February 19, 2012 07:13PM | Registered: 4 years ago Posts: 138 |
Re: Comparing entry level detectors to higher end machines: Posted by: imi_wakaranai Date: February 19, 2012 07:26PM | Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 114 |
Quote
kai_gold
The difference is often minimal in shallow modern areas with the exception of faster response detectors that will work better in the trash. So if that is all a person is interested in then there is little need for a high end detector. If, however, you enviously watch videos of the guys pulling out a lot of old silver coins and relics, then take note of the metal detectors they are using. There is a reason they are using mid to high end detectors. Better depth, better id at depth, recovery time, stability in mineralization all come to mind. Metal detecting depth is measured in inches not usually feet so every extra inch is important. IMHO
Re: Comparing entry level detectors to higher end machines: Posted by: Steve (TX) Date: February 19, 2012 09:05PM | Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 45 |
Re: Comparing entry level detectors to higher end machines: Posted by: Mtnmn Date: February 20, 2012 08:55PM | Registered: 4 years ago Posts: 619 |
12


