![]() |
Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: PDH
Date: January 24, 2019 08:09PM |
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 47 |
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: calabash digger
Date: January 27, 2019 07:13AM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 3,096 |
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: PDH
Date: January 27, 2019 11:46AM |
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 47 |
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: Mike Hillis
Date: January 28, 2019 08:19AM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 4,364 |
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: MassSaltH2O
Date: February 16, 2019 02:38PM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 304 |
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: PDH
Date: February 16, 2019 06:30PM |
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 47 |
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: joey786
Date: February 18, 2019 08:20AM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 41 |
This is a very important post, I am in the same dilemma, cant decide. The Rutus or the nox 800, they both have their strong points. The only thing I'm a bit nervous about is the battery situation on the nox, would like to change the batteries my self. The Rutus isn't water proof, but I like sound of the tones, very sharp and distinct, I'm not seeing that with the nox. I'm sure both are fantastic machines, but I'm leaning towards the nox 800.Quote
PDH
I have narrowed down my new detector choice to the Rutus Alter 71 or the Equinox. I have watched a lot of videos on the Equinox and it appears to be the cats meow, but the Rutus looks to be equally or even more impressive. From what I've seen, the Rutus looks to be better at unmasking and seems to have a more stable TID. Very limited information on the Rutus compared to the Equinox so I am looking for input/advice from anyone who has used the Rutus and hopefully from someone who has used both machines. I'm primarily a dry land relic hunter so I'm looking for a detector that does well in areas with a lot of iron trash. Thanks in advance.
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: MassSaltH2O
Date: February 18, 2019 10:32AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 304 |
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: Mkus
Date: February 21, 2019 12:37PM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 2,714 |
Watch calabash video all you need to seeQuote
joey786
I have narrowed down my new detector choice to the Rutus Alter 71 or the Equinox. I have watched a lot of videos on the Equinox and it appears to be the cats meow, but the Rutus looks to be equally or even more impressive. From what I've seen, the Rutus looks to be better at unmasking and seems to have a more stable TID. Very limited information on the Rutus compared to the Equinox so I am looking for input/advice from anyone who has used the Rutus and hopefully from someone who has used both machines. I'm primarily a dry land relic hunter so I'm looking for a detector that does well in areas with a lot of iron trash. Thanks in advance.
This is a very important post, I am in the same dilemma, cant decide. The Rutus or the nox 800, they both have their strong points. The only thing I'm a bit nervous about is the battery situation on the nox, would like to change the batteries my self. The Rutus isn't water proof, but I like sound of the tones, very sharp and distinct, I'm not seeing that with the nox. I'm sure both are fantastic machines, but I'm leaning towards the nox 800.
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: Zinc Penny
Date: April 01, 2019 01:52AM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 271 |
Re: Rutus Alter 71 Posted by: texkinzee
Date: April 13, 2019 12:26PM |
Registered: 11 months ago Posts: 48 |