Findmall.com
 
 






Vintage Detecting Forum


Welcome! Log In Register
avatar
Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: straker
Date: December 23, 2018 02:22PM
I don't know about you guys,but I still like to swing the older analog units. I have 3 that were made in 1986. 2 Teknetics Mark series and a 'Bud Lite'. They still git r done!

avatar
Re: Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: lytle78
Date: December 23, 2018 02:44PM
The folks who remember them have - sadly - “dropped off” significantly.



Rick Kempf

avatar
Re: Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: straker
Date: December 23, 2018 02:54PM
Unfortunately...that appears to be the answer to my question. :sad:



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 12/23/2018 02:59PM by straker.

Re: Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: Joe(TX)
Date: December 23, 2018 03:17PM
I still like collecting vintage metal detectors and maybe there being less collectors out there is good in the sense that I have less competition! lol

Re: Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: Tom_in_CA
Date: December 24, 2018 09:33AM
The Tek Mark 1 was an awesome machine. But when it comes to the subject of "vintage metal detectors", I tend to think of that as stuff from the 1940s, 50s, 60s, etc.... Not something still usable/competitive for today. A few machines in the 20 to 30 yr. old range can still-hold their own. And in some cases (the 77b) can do things that today's machines can't do. So for those machines that might be 20 yrs. old (cz6, for example) and still used today, I don't consider "vintage". But that's just me.

As for collecting vintage machines from the 1950s, 60s, etc....: There was never much demand or interest in the first place. If the subject ever came up on a thread, there'd be few persons to input. And when forums specific to the topic were put up, few persons chime in. So it occurs to me that there's simply not much interest .

And for those that ever did take a liking to the nostalgia, and wanted to buy up curiosity pieces: There was never a lack of them to choose from. They show up at flea markets, garage sales, etc.... all the time. So those that ever cared to collect, tend to have long-since gotten all they wanted, for cheap. So there's just no demand.

Re: Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: Joe(TX)
Date: December 25, 2018 04:21PM
Still a lot of demand for vintage detectors or maybe we should call them Collectable Detectors...electronics goes obsolete very quickly...any way I like to collect the early TID and the VLF/TR models and the earlier BFO and TR models... just look on @#$%&...some are getting repectable prices.

avatar
Re: Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: straker
Date: December 27, 2018 02:19PM
Quote
Tom_in_CA
The Tek Mark 1 was an awesome machine. But when it comes to the subject of "vintage metal detectors", I tend to think of that as stuff from the 1940s, 50s, 60s, etc.... Not something still usable/competitive for today. A few machines in the 20 to 30 yr. old range can still-hold their own. And in some cases (the 77b) can do things that today's machines can't do. So for those machines that might be 20 yrs. old (cz6, for example) and still used today, I don't consider "vintage". But that's just me.

As for collecting vintage machines from the 1950s, 60s, etc....: There was never much demand or interest in the first place. If the subject ever came up on a thread, there'd be few persons to input. And when forums specific to the topic were put up, few persons chime in. So it occurs to me that there's simply not much interest .

And for those that ever did take a liking to the nostalgia, and wanted to buy up curiosity pieces: There was never a lack of them to choose from. They show up at flea markets, garage sales, etc.... all the time. So those that ever cared to collect, tend to have long-since gotten all they wanted, for cheap. So there's just no demand.

When I speak of 'Vintage' I mean anything over 30 years old. I doubt it very much that people still use any of the pre-1970 metal detectors as a primary unit.

Re: Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: Arthur-Canada
Date: January 07, 2019 05:45PM
Although these days I can easily afford the "best" metal detector out there on the market, finding just more of the same stuff I have found for the past 20 years does not excite me one bit. 90% of all the really good keepers I have found in 20 years have come from 8" deep or less...easily found by most detectors since the early 80's.

Most of the guys I detect with have all the newest and coolest detectors they can afford and yet almost never do they dig anything good any deeper than 8".

When I'm in the mood to hunt with something that gives be lots of target information I use my Mark 1, which goes deeper than anything I have and ID's it! If I'm feeling like my ears need a rest I just go with my Wilson R&C ll. If it beeps both ways, it is always not iron 99% of the time.

The fun in detecting for me nowadays is trying to hear the subtle almost imperceptible differences in the beep from my Wilson that can tell me what the target is before I dig it. Also, digging a keeper just on the edge of a 30 year old detector's capabilities gives me much more of a thrill then buying a fancy new detector that pretty much does everything but dig the hole for you. What's the challenge in that?!?!

Re: Is it me or has anyone noticed that the interests in vintage metal detectors dropped off significantly?
Posted by: Tom_in_CA
Date: January 08, 2019 06:10AM
Quote
Arthur-Canada
Although these days I can easily afford the "best" metal detector out there on the market, finding just more of the same stuff I have found for the past 20 years does not excite me one bit. 90% of all the really good keepers I have found in 20 years have come from 8" deep or less...easily found by most detectors since the early 80's.

Most of the guys I detect with have all the newest and coolest detectors they can afford and yet almost never do they dig anything good any deeper than 8".

When I'm in the mood to hunt with something that gives be lots of target information I use my Mark 1, which goes deeper than anything I have and ID's it! If I'm feeling like my ears need a rest I just go with my Wilson R&C ll. If it beeps both ways, it is always not iron 99% of the time.

The fun in detecting for me nowadays is trying to hear the subtle almost imperceptible differences in the beep from my Wilson that can tell me what the target is before I dig it. Also, digging a keeper just on the edge of a 30 year old detector's capabilities gives me much more of a thrill then buying a fancy new detector that pretty much does everything but dig the hole for you. What's the challenge in that?!?!

Good post. As for the comment about most of the good stuff you want, being in the top 8" : I distinctly recall in the days (mid 1970s) when we hunted with all-metal TR's (77b's, 66TR's,), that our depth was perhaps 5" in the school yards, we had visions of how "a few more inches would get us into un-limited barbers and IH's". Yet as the 1980s dawned, and we easily went to 7 to 8", I noticed that .... there was not magically the older coins. Oh sure, we did better. But I eventually realized that the shere demographics of the American economy after WWII (the most prosperous time in american affluence), was different than the pre-war era. Kids simply didn't carry that much coins during the depression and earlier times.

And we also discovred that if a person wanted the older coins, that the much bigger factor was WHERE you hunted. Not how much depth you could get. So now, looking back at all the reales, gold coins, seateds, etc.... that I've found, I realize that they weren't necessarily deep. They were 99% a function of "location location location".

That's not to say I don't welcome depth + bells & whistles though.

Also: As for the "past 20 yrs. not exciting you" : Yes: many of the machines introduced as much as 20 yrs. ago, are still every bit as competitive as machines introduced today. The reason is: We hit the point-of-diminishing returns, on the laws of physics. There's only so-much signal you can pump into the ground. And only so much signal response/interpretation that you can pull back out of the ground. So there came a point where No amount of "smaller and faster" (that's the electronics evolution) would change the laws of physics.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login