I haven't used the 10.5HFDD yet, but have one on the way, so I don't have a preference yet. As discovered by engineers like George Payne(a giant in this industry), low conductors(gold, lead etc) respond better as you go higher in frequency. Keep in mind these are degrees of improvement. i.e. the MF are better than the LF, and the HF is better than the MF. So the prospectors and small gold hunters are using the HF's as a general rule to eek out that last little amount of performance.
The target ID behavior is actually a benefit, as on many detectors deeper targets fall into lower ID categories like iron, which causes you to ignore them as iron. That's precisely why on Old Sox's report of what looks like his found three ringers ending up as an iron ID, didn't sound right. Thanks for providing the ID range which is higher than I thought it would be. I am not in an area where three ringers are found, but I have found boat loads of non-clad rifle & pistol rounds along with small caliber musket balls.
It looks like you're in an area to find more three ringers, so the next time you think you have one under coil I'd like to know how it reacts in Prospecting Mode with an IM(Iron Mask) setting of 5. Especially if you have what you think is a deep one in the 6inch+ range. I have a suspicion that in Prospecting Mode you may be able to get 50% more depth, especially if the soil is mineralized to any degree. If she really bangs out, I'd try that mode for awhile if their isn't any modern trash around. Just curiosity and a suggestion on my part, so don't feel obligated, I'm just trying to learn more myself.
Also interested how the 3KHz ID's these deep three ringers in comparison.
HH
BarnacleBill