Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

DD COILS and the GOLDQUEST

A

Anonymous

Guest
Quite a bit of interest has developed as a result of the experiments conducted with DD coils on the Goldquest SS. In view of this I might be good just to review the reasons for these experiments and the differences between DD
 
Hey Eric Foster
I asked this about 8 months ago(New Gold Detector) for California Gold Hunting, your reply then was your working on it. Been watching this forum since then but NOTHING...
Have you stop work on this Detector???
Looking to try something other than a MineLab...
Will the GoldQuest SS with MineLab DD connectors work in my Area??? Will it also take your Mono or MineLab Mono Coils???
I think its Great your designing you Detector to use MineLab Coils!!! Why re-invent the Wheel if you don't have too.
Thanks!!!
Brad Gotori
bgotori@hotmail.com
 
Hey Eric Foster
Forgot to ask this in last post.
Will there be a switch on the MODDED GQ SS for Mono and DD coils???
Thanks!!!
Brad Gotori
bgotori@hotmail.com
 
Hi Brad,
Been working on it ever since, but I have to slot development in with the production schedule for existing detectors.
Unfortunately, I do not know what conditions are like in the California goldfields. Perhaps Reg, or someone else who is familiar with that area can give some idea.
I've not tried a ML mono, but if the DD works, then there is no reason for the mono not to. My 11in mono will be available with a ML connector for those that want a lighter and fully waterproof coil with an open centre. <span style="background-color:#ffff00;">Note that my Goldquest mono coil will not work on a Minelab detector as the resistance is much too high.</span>
Eric.</span>
 
Hi Brad,
I would love to tell you that the GQ would work fine where you hunt, but the fact is, I have never nugget hunted west of the western AZ border, so I really do not know what you will run into if you try the GQ equipped with a DD coil.
My guess is any mono coil will or at least, could display quite a bit of ground response, making it somewhat difficult unless you really slow your sweep speed down and take extra care in keeping the coil level above the ground. I expect this to be the same when using a ML compatible mono coil.
I do know a friend of mine who hunts in California has run into some really bad ground and couldn't hunt effectively with a mono coil without some form of ground balance (GB).
I am not sure just how well the DD coil works at that location without any GB turned on. Maybe Rick will jump in and let us know.
Now, I have hunted a lot of different areas in AZ with my GQ clone while using a home made DD coil and found I could hunt all areas just fine without any ground balance. I don't expect that to change when using a ML compatible coil. In fact, my initial test indicated the ML coil did a great job of minimizing the ground signals where I tested it. Now, this testing is very limited, but I dont' expect that to change much either.
Now, I will admit there were a couple of areas that did require a little slower sweep to minimize what ground signals I was getting when using the DD, but overall, I found it was quite easy to hunt most anywhere I tried. Again, I would expect little or no change when using a ML compatible DD coil. In fact, my guess is, the DD coils will be the ones a person will ultimately prefer using in most areas. It is the coil I would recommend.
In some of the more mineralized areas I found in AZ, it was quite difficult to try to hunt with a mono coil, so I don't expect that to change when using ML compatible mono coils. In those areas I needed to raise the mono coil to minimize the ground signals. Increasing the autotune speed also helped.
I wish I could give you a better answer to your question but this is as good of info as I can give you.
One last point, don't sell the DD coil short. On my GQ clone, I find that the DD will match the mono coil for depth or beat it when comparing target signals from buried items in some really bad ground. Where the mono coil seems to appear to do better is in a simple air test of the two coils.
Reg
 
Hey Reg, Eric
Man I'm getting old... lost all my bookmarks and forgot what this forum was called...
Thanks for the Info Reg on the ML DD coils!!!
Eric do you think I should wait for Your New Gold detector, or get the GQ SS with ML connector??? Saving my pennies and in no real rush, but would like some other detector besides my MXT.
Thanks Again!!!
Brad Gotori
bgotori@hotmail.com
 
Top