Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Deep Tech Vistas

[size=large]Frank, It will all depends on the area that you are hunting. Relic hunting, old homes, old parks, you will want to dig all non-ferrous targets. In a real life situation, at old homes, I will dig an average of 1 good target to 4- 5 bad targets. But there is something that you have to remember, all jewelry, coins, buttons, etc will be dug that could easily be missed with a detector running more discrimination or a notch. A lot of foil targets will be pinky rings, ear rings, etc., while targets between nickels and zincs will be dug, resulting in considerable more jewelry. Some coins will apply here too since at depth, they may fall out of the coin range..Extended discrimination detectors, will call these targets as bad since all they can see is that there is a target there.
The person will let it go since the detector has "mis-informed him because of a lack of information. With the Deeptech, you will dig... I hope this helps... Richard[/size]
 
Don't know, Frank in NH :)
But now I am happy that some finds with DeepTech Vista - in this case bronze cleaver dated 2000-1500 BC - enter in the worlds museums and in Press :) :
http://m.budejckadrbna.cz/zpravy/spolecnost/11998-detektorar-nasel-u-budejc-sekyru-z-doby-bronzove.html
The pictures was published some days ago in Vista Gold DeepTech MetalDetector Facebook group from the guy who discovered it :

[attachment 332385 danielmacek1.jpg]

[attachment 332386 danielmacek2.jpg]
 
Top