I dont want to clutter up the other recent post requesting more DISC from Deeptech. I simply want to paint a different view.
My primary detectors for the past 4 years have been F75 and MMK. The F75 has a ton of power, and in my mostly mild soil, is exceptionally deep. However, in the many very old sites I get to dig in (from about 1720s on) eastern PA, I have found a very low quantity of old coins in the lower portion of the disc scale. I know they are there. The main coins in question are ones like the 3 cent nickel (not trime), FE cent, 1 dollar gold, and at depth/vertical in hole, higher coins.
I took all my samples of low conductive coins, and tested them all with VGG, both vertical positioned and lying flat. I started the disc at the far right, and just kept turning it lower until each one of those coins registered high tone. That spot is JUST past 12oclock for the gold coin and 3cent on edge. So there is where my disc limit is at..although I usually set it lower at the default spot.
I am pretty sure that when I am using the F75 and MMK, I am mentally discriminating higher, and not focused enough just on the sound..VGG lets me get rid of the mental discrimination, and just focus on the sounds.
Since getting the VGG, I have re-visited two sites which have had a fairly high coin count. At both sites, I dug multiple 5 cent nickels at pretty good depths I am certain I walked over quite a few times with both of the other detectors. two of them were shallow, but vertically positioned.
It gives me confidence that I have a better chance of nailing a gold coin at the depths they are most likely resting at, just going with the low disc.
I do understand modern coin shooting is way different than what I am trying to do. I have seen many articles describing how adding disc causes a loss in depth. I would hate to lose a powerful depth unit for the option of adding disc. If they would do it with different models....I am all for that !!
HH
My primary detectors for the past 4 years have been F75 and MMK. The F75 has a ton of power, and in my mostly mild soil, is exceptionally deep. However, in the many very old sites I get to dig in (from about 1720s on) eastern PA, I have found a very low quantity of old coins in the lower portion of the disc scale. I know they are there. The main coins in question are ones like the 3 cent nickel (not trime), FE cent, 1 dollar gold, and at depth/vertical in hole, higher coins.
I took all my samples of low conductive coins, and tested them all with VGG, both vertical positioned and lying flat. I started the disc at the far right, and just kept turning it lower until each one of those coins registered high tone. That spot is JUST past 12oclock for the gold coin and 3cent on edge. So there is where my disc limit is at..although I usually set it lower at the default spot.
I am pretty sure that when I am using the F75 and MMK, I am mentally discriminating higher, and not focused enough just on the sound..VGG lets me get rid of the mental discrimination, and just focus on the sounds.
Since getting the VGG, I have re-visited two sites which have had a fairly high coin count. At both sites, I dug multiple 5 cent nickels at pretty good depths I am certain I walked over quite a few times with both of the other detectors. two of them were shallow, but vertically positioned.
It gives me confidence that I have a better chance of nailing a gold coin at the depths they are most likely resting at, just going with the low disc.
I do understand modern coin shooting is way different than what I am trying to do. I have seen many articles describing how adding disc causes a loss in depth. I would hate to lose a powerful depth unit for the option of adding disc. If they would do it with different models....I am all for that !!
HH