Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

E-trac or Explorer?

Josey Wales

New member
Hey everyone, Happy Holidays! Ok here is my problem, I'm having a hard time trying to decide on which detector to buy, E-trac or Explorer. I've been a White's XLT user for 15 years and I'm anxious to make the jump to Minelab! Besides the price, whats the biggest difference between the two? Does one detect deeper than the other or separate trash better? Right now with the Holiday deals on the Explorer I'm kinda leaning on it, that sounds like a really good price, but if anyone has used both and think the E-trac is superior, I would love to hear about it before making the decision! Thanks in advance for any replies.
 
i went from the xlt to the se pro and very glad i did the etrac was my first choice but not in stock at time i ordered mine i hear the etrac little easyier to learn and faster prosser both about same depth etrac sepperates little better im told either detectors are excellent and if given time and learned worlds over your old xlt by the way xlt is still a great detector i still have mine great back up or loner
 
:usaflag:What about the Safari? Has anyone used it and what is their opinion? Pros and cons?
 
McDave said:
What about the Safari?

Josey wasn't interested in the Safari, but if you are, that would be a great question for you to ask of the Safari Group.
 
I have posted this response before for people when they are asking the "which machine" question.:)

I was asked many times about which machine I felt was deeper and which machine they should get (explorer vs. E-Trac)...this was my reply:....

I have found 11" deep dimes with the Explorer 2...SE...and the E-Trac...so there is no difference in depth for me.

The following few statements apply to some hunters (not all). They are my OWN personal opinions and I am not trying to "start" a debate...so please don't let it turn into one.

What I am stating comes from 1000's of fairly successful hours on the explorers training my ears to listen for only ONE thing....DEEP coins.

NOT jewelry...relics...trinkets....or even nickels (they aren't on my coin list:biggrin:)...etc...ONLY deep coins...more specificlly... the sound of deep silver and injuns'.

For some people I feel that if you really never got over the "hump" and broke into the 10" deep coin barrier with the Explorers...then the E-Trac seems like the "answer".

IMHO it is smoother than my SE and might ID visually at depth slightly better when hunting with some iron mask...which might give that same explorer user what seemed to be perceived as "more depth".

However IMHO my SE ID's better by sound at depth than my E-Trac.

The key to success at finding deep or previously masked coins with the Explorers is 100% SOUND...and sound alone.

If a person somewhat "mastered" the deep silver sound of the explorers...and finds the deeper and older coins in the 10" to 11" range...then the E-Trac won't do as much for you as it did the explorer user who truthfully just never was able to learn the sounds and language it spoke over deep and masked coins. It comes ONLY with experience and 1000's of hours at different sites...in different conditions...with different iron levels...and different trash levels...etc.

Many people try too much too fast...this setting...that setting...instead of just getting out there...having fun...experimenting over deeper targets...and just plain old learning the machine.

Do I feel I have "mastered" my machine?....NO WAY. I feel I learn something each time out.

Me personally and honestly...YES...I have found some deep and walked over coins with the E-Trac that I myself missed at some of my pounded sites with my SE and EX2.

WHY??...possibly because in some spots the E-Trac ID'ed better visually at depth at those particular sites.

The flipside....I have also found deep, walked over coins with my SE that my E-Trac missed.

WHY??...because for me it ID's better by sound than the E-trac...and because of the RAW power it has..which I run pretty much maxed with high gain and highest possible sensitivity for that particular site.

ALSO...because I have spent a gazillion hours training my ears to listen for deep coins in iron and trash...more particularly to discern deep coins hiding in iron FROM deep iron falses and chirps.

Is it foolproof?....NOPE I dig iron every now and then...but I also find my share of seated and older coins.

The E-Trac does have an ever so slightly faster processor...but I notice no difference. I never even utilize the "fast" feature on the SE because I feel it "chops" the signal too short...and I don't like that.

The one feature on the E-Trac that I do personally love is the quickmask feature because I'm able to instantly switch to an all metal ID'ing mode and it really cleans up those deep, iffy signals.

I truly make up for that though on the SE by utilizing the ID'ing all metal pinpoint mode that is exclusive on the SE and not on the other explorers...as a last decision maker on whether or not to dig.

Anyway...my opinion of the E-trac being deeper than the explorer is what it is. I do not feel it is deeper...and I did the best I could to explain my personal opinion.

It just takes most people a little longer to get used to all the sounds on the SE...where the E-Trac seems to be a little smoother when transferring those sounds to the ears.

Once that different language starts to "click" for you though...I truthfully feel the Explorers are the best deep turf silver coin finders made.

IMHO...no way the E-trac gives me that same unmistakable high pitched "silver warble" that I get with my SE....and as I said...sound is the key to the explorers success. I can get the sound close on the E-Trac...but "close" only counts in horseshoes.

The SE is my "go to" machine...HANDS DOWN.:thumbup:

With the sweet price on a new SE right now...I'd give one a shot. However IMHO IF you buy the SE and not the SE pro...you will need to purchase either the 11" pro coil...10 x 12 SEF coil...or 12" Sunray coil. Myself along with a ton of others did not like the stock slimline SE coil because it just didn't seem stable enough. I would even suggest a used Minelab stock EX2 1050 coil for an SE without one of the coils I just mentioned. It really "settles" the SE down and makes it a smooth running weapon.

All this being said...EITHER the SE OR an E-Trac will reward you WELL if you are patient enough to learn the language.
 
[size=large]one bennie of having an xlt, as i did today, is being able to confirm pin pointing and targets of my se. you get to see how far off or how good you do with the se or
e-trac. so when you decide on which one don't get rid of your xlt unless you must. i didn't get to test much today but saw my nickel count zoom.:cheers:[/size]
 
Top