Mike (Virginia Beach)
New member
Not overwhlemingly...as I suspected, it's like hunting with an old friend. But maybe one that has learned a few new tricks.
I have 9 targets buried along the fence in the backyard, from 6" to 8" deep, about 6 years ago. They have all sunk at least an inch or so and due to the hardness of the ground as well as an underground power line, it's tough detecting. I used to be able to hit them all with the Explorer II, but only at 18 sensitivity. If I went to 20 it got harder and above 20 you would lose most of them. The Quattro hit them all at 15 on the scale of 20. The CZ-70 hit all but 2 of them at any setting. So today I spent a good hour and a half out there, testing the SE on all of them and changing settings and tones along the way, playing with the sensitivity, etc. I found that with the SE and the new slimline coil, 20 is "the new 18"...at least in my yard and on my test range. It was able to hit all the targets and get good ID on them at that setting. It did not seem to hit a great deal harder on most of the targets, but I did notice that it ID'd the 58 cal musket ball a little better than the other two, which bodes well for it's use as a relic machine since I dug many a deep musket, minnie, and button with both the Explorer II and the Quattro. The SE also hit harder and cleaner on the 8"+ deep Merc dime I have buried there. And it sung out loud and proud with the 10"+ silver quarter and came in with a nice 00-29 on the digital. One thing I really liked was the fact that it ID's in pinpoint mode and the closer you get to dead-center on the target you can really get that digital reading to get good numbers. Like Jerry said, that's cool. I would say that the slimline coil is a bit more sensitive than the Minelab 10.5" was.
Next I went to try some actual detecting, at a couple of sites that have been HAMMERED for years by me and a number of others, with every heavy-hitter machine you could name. These sites produced many silver coins, Indians, a few Large Cents, buttons, etc. over the years. But in the last couple of years, I'm about the only one that will hunt them anymore because they are pretty well dead. I always take my new machines there to try them...when I got the Quattro, I found a few things there the other had missed. Same with the Explorer II. One is an old house site and the other is the sprawling grounds of an old school that goes back to the '30s. Both have a lot of iron and trash as well...lots of rusty nails and roof tacks. So I set the SE to 20 sensitivity and ran the noise cancel and it was pretty stable. Running it up to 22 or 24 was tough...I tried it a few times and, like the Explorer II at those sites, it didn't like it. But I made some nice recoveries with some good depth and nice ID and tone with it set that way. I was running "Deep" on, "Fast" off, Variability at 10, Gain 6, Limits 6, Ferrous tones, Normal sounds, Iron Mask in All Metal...it ran well this way and when I wasn't going over something the threshold was nice and smooth. When I would get a target that had some depth and sounded good I would play around with the sensitivity and other settings but for these sites, the way I had it set was about as good as it could get. I didn't have long to hunt...only about an hour and a half, and I was playing around a lot but I ended up getting some clad and 3 '30's and '40's wheaties from the school and a 1919 Merc and a 1908 Indian from the house site, so definitely a success.
Tomorrow I'm going with some friends to a farmhouse site that HAS been hunted, though we don't know how much or how well. Hopefully I will get to see the SE do some more cool stuff. So far, I like it just fine. Here's my little haul from today...nothing major, but not too shabby from "hunted out" sites.
I have 9 targets buried along the fence in the backyard, from 6" to 8" deep, about 6 years ago. They have all sunk at least an inch or so and due to the hardness of the ground as well as an underground power line, it's tough detecting. I used to be able to hit them all with the Explorer II, but only at 18 sensitivity. If I went to 20 it got harder and above 20 you would lose most of them. The Quattro hit them all at 15 on the scale of 20. The CZ-70 hit all but 2 of them at any setting. So today I spent a good hour and a half out there, testing the SE on all of them and changing settings and tones along the way, playing with the sensitivity, etc. I found that with the SE and the new slimline coil, 20 is "the new 18"...at least in my yard and on my test range. It was able to hit all the targets and get good ID on them at that setting. It did not seem to hit a great deal harder on most of the targets, but I did notice that it ID'd the 58 cal musket ball a little better than the other two, which bodes well for it's use as a relic machine since I dug many a deep musket, minnie, and button with both the Explorer II and the Quattro. The SE also hit harder and cleaner on the 8"+ deep Merc dime I have buried there. And it sung out loud and proud with the 10"+ silver quarter and came in with a nice 00-29 on the digital. One thing I really liked was the fact that it ID's in pinpoint mode and the closer you get to dead-center on the target you can really get that digital reading to get good numbers. Like Jerry said, that's cool. I would say that the slimline coil is a bit more sensitive than the Minelab 10.5" was.
Next I went to try some actual detecting, at a couple of sites that have been HAMMERED for years by me and a number of others, with every heavy-hitter machine you could name. These sites produced many silver coins, Indians, a few Large Cents, buttons, etc. over the years. But in the last couple of years, I'm about the only one that will hunt them anymore because they are pretty well dead. I always take my new machines there to try them...when I got the Quattro, I found a few things there the other had missed. Same with the Explorer II. One is an old house site and the other is the sprawling grounds of an old school that goes back to the '30s. Both have a lot of iron and trash as well...lots of rusty nails and roof tacks. So I set the SE to 20 sensitivity and ran the noise cancel and it was pretty stable. Running it up to 22 or 24 was tough...I tried it a few times and, like the Explorer II at those sites, it didn't like it. But I made some nice recoveries with some good depth and nice ID and tone with it set that way. I was running "Deep" on, "Fast" off, Variability at 10, Gain 6, Limits 6, Ferrous tones, Normal sounds, Iron Mask in All Metal...it ran well this way and when I wasn't going over something the threshold was nice and smooth. When I would get a target that had some depth and sounded good I would play around with the sensitivity and other settings but for these sites, the way I had it set was about as good as it could get. I didn't have long to hunt...only about an hour and a half, and I was playing around a lot but I ended up getting some clad and 3 '30's and '40's wheaties from the school and a 1919 Merc and a 1908 Indian from the house site, so definitely a success.
Tomorrow I'm going with some friends to a farmhouse site that HAS been hunted, though we don't know how much or how well. Hopefully I will get to see the SE do some more cool stuff. So far, I like it just fine. Here's my little haul from today...nothing major, but not too shabby from "hunted out" sites.