Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

F70 for gold nuggets?

I recently picked up a used F70 and Im really impressed with how sensitive and easy to use it is...
I was wondering if any of you use yours for nugget shooting?
If so, would you share any recommendations or advice you may have?
Thanks.
 
I don't, but I have read a lot written buy the guy that designed this one among others.

Here is an essay with some basics...

http://www.fisherlab.com/hobby/davejohnson/goldprospectingmetaldetectiontechnologies.htm


Here is a book with a whole bunch more tidbits and advice if you skim through it.
Many pertain to setting up many top end Fisher models, not just the Goldbug.
One of the top two on this page...
http://www.fisherlab.com/hobby/dave-johnson-essays.htm

The third one about the Goldbug might be helpful too but I have never downloaded or read that one.
 
The F70 is usually thought of as a coins & relics machine, but its basic performance as a gold machine is about the same as the T2. If you prefer to ground balance manually, the F70 doesn't offer that but most people agree that the "ground grab" feature works very well.

In general for gold prospecting you'll want to use smaller searchcoils. Most people prefer DD's for prospecting but in the 10 inch elliptical and smaller sizes, concentrics do about as well overall (the legendary GB2 uses concentrics). However DD's and concentrics respond a bit differently so it's not apples vs. apples.
 
Top