Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Here's a post Jerry made a few months back...

A

Anonymous

Guest
<FONT COLOR="#ff0000"><BIG><CENTER><STRONG>MXT - SC Beach Report & Performance Review </STRONG></CENTER></BIG></FONT>
<BIG><STRONG>SITE: Seabrook Island, South Carolina </STRONG></BIG>
I metal detected several days with the MXT on the beach, here are my opinions:
<STRONG>The Conditions and Equipment Used: </STRONG>
The beaches were often very desolate and seemed only lightly used this time of year. I could hunt for 30 minutes at a time without even a hint of a signal. These beaches had some heavy deposits of black sand in certain areas.
I used the Prospecting Mode and the Stock 950 concentric coil to hunt and get the ground ID readings. I'd think you could do even better with the larger DD coil but maybe not quite as deep. The dry sand area gave ground readings from 3 to 70 (the 70 reading coming on the heaviest of black sand).
<STRONG>Field Results: </STRONG>
The MXT ran smooth as silk in all the dry sand areas. I ran the Sensitivity at +1 and the Discrimination at the pre-set. I also ran the Threshold at Silent Search. This is because I found that if you ran an audible threshold the detector was a little chattery which can drive you nuts on a lonely beach. In the dry sand the ID was always accurate.
Damp sand areas read at 3 so I could raise the sensitivity to +2 here with no problems. Any higher sensitivity and I got some false signals.
<STRONG>ID Note:</STRONG> I decided to bury a quarter in the wet soupy sand to see if the MXT would ID correctly there. I buried the quarter at around 5-6", refilled the hole with the soupy mixture and scanned the target. The MXT consistently ID'd the quarter as a good target but it ID
 
Top