Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Hey guys....I usually post on the Beach & Water forum...

Gulf Huntress

New member
I have been using a Garrett Sea Hunter Mark II and have had a lot of success with the unit and am thinking of taking it to the next level with either an Aquasearch (leaning more toward Eric's unit) or maybe an Infinium. I know that I could expect greater depth with both of the above, but what else do these units do that my Mark II will not do in surf hunting. Is there any way that ya'll can tell when the target is a nail or bobby pin with these 2 units, besides a double blip signal. If I could take these 2 targets out of the equation, there would be no limit to what could be found. I also run an Excal, but don't feel that it gets pi depth. Of course in the surf, you can only dig so deep, unless you have a dredge before the hole fills in. Lemme hear from you surf pirates out there! Forgot to log out of my wife's name, my name is Gulf Hnuter!
 
Gulfhunter,

I'm an avid water hunter, and in fact, it accounts for about 95% of all my detecting time. About 3 years ago, I purchased the Goldquest SS from Eric Foster and I modified it to be completely submersible. The Aquasearch performance is very similar to the Goldquest (depth/sensitivity). This detector was my only one for these years and I loved it (and still do). Recently, I purchased the Excalibur and I am very happy with this machine, especially with it's iron discrimination. What surprised me was this....in clean, whitish beach sand, the Excalibur was equal to the PI in depth when sniffing out coins and gold rings.....I did extensive/fair tests and just couldn't separate the depth performance between them in the beach conditions described above. I assumed that the Goldquest would leave the Excal behind, especially on gold targets (and probably coins). Now, I also did the same tests on a different beach that has some moderate black sand and here, the Goldquest had maybe a 2" advantage over the Excal. The Goldquest threshold was rock solid, whilst the Excal chatted quite a bit until the sensitivity was reduced to about the 2 o'clock position and thus reducing the depth ability.
As for the recognising iron objects.....the audio never has that pleasing tone....it can sound harsh, irregular and just "too big" relative to the objects true size (especially bottlecaps). The sound of iron is just something that given time, you will come to recognise.
Bottom line for me is this: The Excalibur is equal to my PI in non or low mineralised sand for the detection of non ferrous targets AND the PI will pull ahead when mineralised sands increase and is my detector of choice when I encounter these conditions (always take both with me).

I've never been able to replicate the depths (PI or VLF) that others attest to, such as 20" on a coin or ring. I understand the concept of "halos", etc and acknowledge that my tests are done on freshly buried targets....but then again, in summer, most goodies are freshly dropped, some are picked up quickly, some may sink beyond reach until sands start shifting....but very few have started to really develop much iron leaching. Sorry, digressed a bit.....hope some of this info helps.
One last thing......digging up a coin or ring that is buried past 10" into the sea-bed is very difficult (even in waist deep water)....my test for this was to tie a length of fishing line to a metal washer and mark off the inches with a paint pen....when the 10" "mark" is flush with the top of the seabed, walk away, come back and try to dig the target up......surprisingly difficult and time consuming !!
 
Thanks for the input Tony, I'm sure the Excal is doing an adequate job, but can't help but think that the Aquasearch could get a lttle deeper. Like you say though, it's hard to recover a target 10" deep in the surf. At least I knew it was there, but then if it is a bobby pin or nail, then I'd have worked in vain. I do hunt out deeper and the ferrous stuff is not as common as in close to shore. It would seem that gold especially would be deeper in the sand than any other metal. Just looking for any advantage over the competition. Maybe I should just stick with what I have. I hunt in Galveston surf and it is highly mineralized, but real fine. There is another guy using an Aquasearch and he usually does pretty well. I have hunted with him using the Mark II and done as well or better than him. The bottom line is if you don't put your coil over the target, you ain't gonna find it! Undecided...
 
One thing is for sure....the Aquasearch will get down deeper than your Garrett PI....by how much....not sure on that one. A friend of mine has a modded Surfmaster PI and my Goldquest is about 25% deeper on any gold ring. It sounds like your beach conditions certainly warrant a high performance PI.....(that's the professional way of saying "Damn, I'm gonna have me a bad boy PI detector"). N0-one will be enjoying an advantage over you !!:yo::yo:

Enjoy the decision making...:stretcher:
Tony,
Perth :ausflag:
 
Top