Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Jerry (Tinfoil), regarding a post reply you made below. :confused:

Monte

Well-known member
below you were reflecting on using your X-Terra 70 with the new DD elliptical coil. In answering questions about your set-up, you replied:

"Sen. 28
Noise cancel auto.
Auto G/B machine. ground Balanced at 82 at this spot. Will auto just as good as manual. Sometimes put it a couple of numbers higher or Positive G/B just depends how bad the ground is and where I am at. This is bad ground as you see at 82 so didnot go anymore pos.
Track off.
Beach off.
Buffs read 12/14 maybe jump to 16 if deep like 8" to 10"s otherwise 12 at 4 to 6"s. Just depends how corroded they are and how bad the ground mineralization is.
Silver war nickles 1942 to 1945 shallow 2 to 4"sread 12, 4 to 6"s 12/14, 8 to 10"s they jump around a little 12/14/16 just depends how corroded they are. Down here they get a little corroded with the salt salinty and sulpher we have in the ground down here. Copper does not do well in places here. Hope you find a bunch as all the old sites I have been hunting have been beat to death and about all there is left is buffs , sheild , v, and war nickles. Which is ok, it helps to dig those targets for button hunting."


I found it interesting, and most of my findings agree with yours as far as the higher TID readings on deeper targets, which is often the rule with virtually all makes and models. However, your description of the GB used and the GB adjustment left me a little confused, to say the least! I usually use the Track function or Auto GB to establish a working setting, then I turn Track 'Off' most of the time, and sometimes I tweak the GB setting by one number.

You stated the following:

"Auto G/B machine. ground Balanced at 82 at this spot. Will auto just as good as manual."... If you get a tracked or auto-adjust GB of #82, I truly envy you That is very low mineralization! If this is over any inland site, an '82' out of a rage of '90' is especially low in ground mineralization, and that can also account for getting better TID's on deeper coins, not to mention just getting better coin audible depths.

"Sometimes put it a couple of numbers highter or Positive G/B..."... There is a misunderstanding about the X-Terra's GB settings and just what is a "Positive" or "Negative" Ground Balance.

With the X-Terra 30 the factory preset GB is similar to a setting of #6 on the X-Terra 50. The X-Terra 50's ground balance in deep woodchip-filled playgrounds around here at maybe 5, 6, or 7, so the X-Terra 30's can work w/o any problem. But in the dirt and on many grassy lawns, the X-Terra 50 requires a setting of 2, 3, or 4 due to the higher mineralization. As you can see, adjusting the GB for a lower (smaller) number reflects a more positive GB adjustment, and using the '+' touch-pad isn't a positive adjustment, but rather a more negative GB adjustment as the numeric setting is increased. The higher (larger) the GB number, the lower the mineralization, nd the lower (smaller) the GB number the higher the ground mineralization is.

Because the X-Terra 70 has a much broader adjustment range we are able to get a more "fine-tuned" GB setting. Because the X-Terra 70 has a GB numeric range from 1-to-90, a setting of '27' would be similar to a factory-set GB of the X-Terra 30. Here, in areas where my X-Terra 50 required a setting of '3' I can use '13' or '14' with the X-Terra 70.

I just finished a multi-state metal detecting (and a little fishing and varmint hunting) vacation from April 19-thru-May 1st and never found a location where I could hunt with my X-Terra 70 that allowed (or established) a GB setting lower than #44 to 47.

"... just depends how bad the ground is and where I am at. This is bad ground as you see at 82 so didnot go anymore pos."... You need to try my 'bad ground' because it is much more mineralized!

On Page 42 of the Operator's manual for the X-T 70 it describes how to obtain a good manual GB. It states you can use the '+' touch-pad to increase the GB setting (the numeric setting) or use the '-' touch-pad to decrease the GB setting (the numeric setting). What isn't explained well is that the '+' and '-' touch-pads increase or decrease the numeric settings, but that is not the same as increasing the Ground Balance to be set more positive or decreasing the Ground Balance to be set more negative. It is just the opposite, and I know for a fact that this has caused many newcomers to using the X-Terra 50 & 70 to become very frustrated with performance. Especially those who manually adjust the GB, and most especially on the X-T 50 because is doesn't fine-tune like the X-T 70.

To INCREASE the GB (not the numeric setting) of the X-Terra 50 or 70, you adjust for the smaller number and this will result is a more positive GB adjustment. To DECREASE the GB setting (or make it a more negative GB, you use the '+' touch-pad and adjust for a larger numeric setting.

For example, if an Auto GB or Tracked GB of the X-T-70 resulted in a setting of #21, and if the operator wanted to manually adjust it just slightly more positive, they would use the '-' touch-pad and adjust for a #20 or no more than a #19.

Just thought I'd comment because I know a reason why many have poor performance and noisy operation afield in some environments with the new X=-Terra's is due to the confusing adjustment requirements of the GB setting.

Happy Hunting,

Monte
 
Hi Monte,

Little things like this baffle me. Almost all detectors I've ever used when you increase the numeric ground balance setting you are compensating for increasingly tough ground conditions. Running a higher number results in a more positive setting.

Then a machine like the X-Terra comes out, and they decide to do it the other way around. What's up with that?

The Fisher Gold Strike did a similar thing with the threshold control. Increasing the threshold number "raised" the threshold point. Sounds fine initially but what this meant was increasing the threshold number TURNED DOWN THE THRESHOLD SOUND. To get a threshold sound you had to lower the number!

In theory it does not matter whether you increase or decrease a control setting to get a desired effect, but over time certain conventions arise and I don't see why suddenly a manufacturer will decide what once was up will now be down.

Steve Herschbach
Steve's Mining Journal
 
the numbering on the GB scale is opposite from the digtal to the analog models. Boy does that cause confusion on the forums at times! At least on the CZ's you know that turning the knob clockwise results in a more positive setting.

What gets me is the mineralization factor. The 50 and 70 balance out at 3-4 and 14-15 respectively in MY ground. Now I consider MY ground Mild to Moderate. not liberal or conservative. :lol: The preset machines work well here. If we take Monte results as fact also, then the actual number you balance out at is apparently meaningless!!!! Just like with the CZ's, I feel what is more of an indication as to the amount or iron mineralization can be seen in how touchy the adjustment is. If it takes large number changes to hear a difference when GB'ing you got some good (mild) ground. If one or 2 numbers change the audio response drastically,,,I feel sorry for ya. :biggrin:

I had figured out that the lower number was more positive from reading the manual. The only hint was that it stated if the GB falls between 2 numbers go to the lower one. It just made sense that they would recommend a more positive setting.

Just my thoughts and opinions and until proven wrong I'm sticking to em.

Tom
 
Monte,

Please correct me if I am wrong. I have always looked at the mineralization issue this way, in mild ground you have to set the GB more positive to get a response when lowering the coil during bobbing. Right?

Now I agree on the lower numbers being more positive, So.. it seems to me that what Jerry reported with balancing at a higher number would mean higher mineralization. Right? In other words you get a ground resonse with a less positive setting relative to "mild" ground.

Now, I have never hunted in La so not sure if the alkalinity or sulphur content Jerry spoke of in a previous post would have some kind of effect similar to what we generally refer to as the amount of iron mineralizaiton and how that affects the GB point.

Tom
 
and went to the old park I used to test out my detectors. G/B at the house is 62 not 82, G/B at park is 44, 55, and 66. Where did I get 82 from. :shrug:. Getting old or too many detectors. The audio of the threshold at all these places is a low tone. If I was in manual and I adjusted the numbers down with the - button the tone just stayed low and never went to a higher tone. If I I pushed the + button the tone of the audio did go up. Now all I am trying to do is get the machine a little more positive so it will even be more sensitive to the gold buy increasing the threshold tone in G/B. Now on the DFX you Auto G/B the machine and put a +2 in the machine or increase to a positive G/B by a +2. On the Fishers you G/B to a 0 or stable threshold no increase or decrease in the threshold then just give it a little louder threshold all this does is quites the noise of the machine down a little and lets you hear the smaller gold.
I called Minelab today and asked with the DD on the X70 and if I G/B the machine in one place and got a 44 and then G/B it in another and got a 62 and I asked which spot had the more mineralization. She said the spot that G/B at 62 not the spot that G/B at 44. Then I asked if I wanted to get a more positive G/B to make it more sensitive to gold buy making the machine run even more quiet. She said go down in numbers or push the - button. Now I am really messed up here. If you go down in numbers all you get is a lower tone and the threshold does not increase to make the machine more sensitive to the gold. :rage: this is making me :crazy: . I must be trying to make the X70 work like my Shadow and my Fishers cause now I am really confused. My CZ70 is a digital, my CZ 6A, CZ20,and CZ3D are analog like Tom says. The only thing I do different is I just have to go in different directions on the G/B knob. You can even put a little Pos or a increase in the Threshold on my MXT. Now maybe I got the wrong idea on making a machine a little more quiter so you can hear the gold a little better by increasing the threshold a litte in G/B. So if I have been wrong for 20 years and that is sure possible you know how us old guys are when we get something in there head :crylol: . Now don't everybody :chase: :blowup: me up just be gental to this old guy. After all it is hard trying to keep 13 machines and how they work stright don't you know now. :wiggle: . Later Jerry aka Tinfoil
 
[attachment 27267 GB1.gif]
**************************************************************************
[attachment 27268 GB2.gif]
**************************************************************************
[attachment 27269 GB3.gif]
**************************************************************************
[attachment 27270 GB4.gif]

HH
BarnacleBill
 
I can just see the graphs now! :lol:

I got too much salt and not enough iron. Oh..wait thats my diet.

Sorry about your beach! Better get over there while all the rain has the salt content down. :thumbup:

tom
 
Jerry,

ML's way of doing things with the Ex-terras is certainly different and as Monte pointed out has confused many people I'm sure. Manual GB is done by balancing 2 tones out rather than listening to the ground response so that is kind of a confidence shaker in itself and the numbering system being "backwards" as Steve pointed out don't help either. We just have to go by faith that it works, which it seems to do. I believe the gal at ML gave you some good solid info. Other than for the sake of discussion I don't really care how or why it works, just that it does. :biggrin:

tom
 
the lower the number the higher the mineralzation. Hadn't really noticed it on mine, I just auto ground track, then take it off and after a while repeat the process, has been working for me. HH John
 
You said the following:

"I called Minelab today and asked with the DD on the X70 and if I G/B the machine in one place and got a 44 and then G/B it in another and got a 62 and I asked which spot had the more mineralization. She said the spot that G/B at 62 not the spot that G/B at 44."...

Sorry, but she was wrong. I am certain that her intentions were good, but her answer was incorrect. The X-Terra can be confusing and perhaps she hasn't had ample field time and/or explanation about it.
*
*
Also: "Then I asked if I wanted to get a more positive G/B to make it more sensitive to gold buy making the machine run even more quiet. She said go down in numbers or push the - button."...

That's a confusing Q & A. To many, she may appear to have been correct, but she is not. If you adjust to a smaller (lower) number from the GB required at a site with the [-] touch-pad, that is a slightly positive GB from where you were.

So, yes, the reply was that it will give you a more positive GB but it is in contrast to her first reply which said adjust to a larger number because the higher GB number required reflects a more mineralized environment.

In my book (if I can ever get it done) I am expressly dealing with the Minelab X-Terra models, especially the X-Terra 50 and X-Terra 70, because the GB issues are some of the more confusing.

I will do a cut-and-paste of your posted reply in this thread and I will explain the GB of the X-Terra 50 & 70 later tonight. It will be a new post so as not to be buried.

Happy Hunting,

Monte

PS: For those in the Portland, Oregon area a dealer is sponsoring a 2-day seminar on "Recreational Metal Detecting" and his price is very reasonable. I am doing this seminar and I know there will be a lot of questions about the newest Minelabs! If interested, E-mail and I will give you his contact info.

MonteVB@comcast.net
 
Even though I am running the DD. I am a water hunter and beach hunter and you can bet this machine will go wadding. All I got to do is some sealing and it will be ready to do some wadding. All I wanted to do is put a little audio back is the G/B as you lower it to the ground like I do my Fishers. You don't put much in it, just enough to make it more sensitive to the gold and the real deep targets. It makes a difference in the ID to the point where a normal machine will just read Iron the Fisher will read the target with a ID. The old time fisher guys know what I am talking about. Terry Humphreys showed me this trick many many years ago and that was the way he explained it. I have dug over the years some very very deep targets with my Fisher machines buy adjusting them that way. I have never run my machines at a 0 G/B. Maybe this machine will not do it and the way it is looking right now even when I got the X70 G/B the tone is always a low tone and you have to go a lot of numbers + or - to get any kind of a change. Even My Shadow X5 you go back + 1/4 to 1/2 turn after getting a no change in the signal audio and that will quieten the machine down so you can run it with a little more Sen. and brother I am telling you I can dig some Deep Deep stuff with my X5. I have never owned a machine that will beat the X5. I will put my X5 up against anything out there. It won't even beat my CZ 70 and I had the factory juice it up to max. Or maybe I will just go and G/B my Fishers to 0 G/B and see if there is any change in the ID when I got a real deep target. I guess the mineralization is about average down here. Maybe the Sulphur and the salt salinity down here makes a difference. I don't know. I know the coins especially the copper and V nickles, 2 cent Pisces, buffs, shield nickles get really ate up. I only have a few neg. things to say about the X70. Otherwise I think it is one fine damn machine :clapping::super::clap: . I am even getting to like it better then my Exp ll and that is saying a lot. I don't have anything to say neg about any of you guys that have spent alot of time evaluating the machines. I know how hard it is and I for one really appreciate everyones help. Like you, I have been doing this for 20 years and have been Thur a few machines. I have just never posted very much in the past as I was always working and hunting every chance I got when I have the time. Now that I am retired I can post more hunt more, show more of my ignorance :rofl: and really enjoy the things I love doing most and that is metal detecting. Every machine has it little quirks like this one has. We just have to work with, share all we can find out about the machines, get everything going the right way by getting inputs from all involved That will help myself and all these owners that have them. I saw a old man today that was pushing one of those walkers and I was thinking of how to fix it up so I could metal detect with it, if I ever get that bad where I have to have one. :rofl: Trust me you could bet I would find a way. :lol: The nice thing is we have these forums that we can all share info. about new machines. I could have gotten a X50 but it just did not do what I wanted to with a machine. I am sure glad I waited and they came out with the X70 because I am really pleased with this machine. Anyway, thank you for your time and all the rest of you guys. I am up to reading page 11 in the archives on the X70 and I know I have bought a fine machine :super: thanks to you guys Posts :please: :clapping:. I will be looking forward to your posts so maybe I been doing it wrong all these years or at least saying it wrong anyway :shrug: :lol: :wiggle: Maybe I don't have a clue :rofl: Later Jerry aka Tinfoil
 
thought about the technical wording or how to say things in the right text. I just always adjusted my machines that had G/B abilities like Terry Humphreys showed me on my Fishers and Troy on the X5. On the Fishers with G/B just put it in auto, bob the coil, 0 the tone audio out, then turn the G/B knob back till you get a little audio on the down side of the bobbing. The Xlt that I had for so many years I don't even want to count and the DFX just auto G/B and stick a +2 in the track offset and hunt. I have never been a Tech. nut or really cared about all the tech. stuff. All I want to know, is how to set my machines up, so it will smoke out those real deep coins and buttons. I have always heard the B/S about how depth ain't everything. Well, tell that to the guy that you are walking behind finding all the deep stuff he is missing, cause he don't have his machine set up right or he just has a inferior machine. To me there is nothing worse then hearing excuse me, you missed this one, when someone is going right behind you and pulling the deep stuff out and you ain't got a clue. That will embarrass the heck out of you. I will tell you right now, down here if you are not digging 10"s to get this old stuff, you might as well go home. Now if you want to just go dig some shallow stuff it don't matter what you use. I got a little Ace 250 with a 4" coil that I use to go quartering. It has it's limits. As long as you know that and not expect it to do stuff that the high dollar machines will do you are going to be OK. Is it a good little machine and has a excellent ID. Yes I use it in the trash all the time. Well you know what I am talking about. Later bud Jerry aka Tinfoil
 
Either. Maybe he has been hunting up in the black sand too long. You know that black sand like they got over in Galveston down behind the "Voodo Lounge". Hunting in that stuff will make you :crazy: .The only thing I ever saw work there is my Fishers and my Exp ll. I never have tried my X5 there. I will, when I come over there to hunt with you. Maybe you, I, and John Saldavar can get together and do some hunting over in that area. John S knows the Seaside area and I have never hunted down there. Well, maybe Bill will expound on his color drawing. How did he do that anyway :shrug: . I am not to sharp when it comes to computers. Maybe since I am retired now I will learn. Naw, it will take time away from my metal detecting. :rofl: Later bud Jerry aka Tinfoil.
 
Top