Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Metal Locators and Magnetic Minerals: Possible spurious signals from magnetic viscosity

A

Anonymous

Guest
Eric, Here is a link to my site showing a possible foundation of an old house using a PI detector. I would like to know from someone like yourself if this is possible using a PI. It's has been proved that a old home once was here.
The PI was used with a new device I designed to use with metal detectors called the Arc-Geo Logger.
You can see the plot here.
http://lrlman.com/Pages/Arc-Geo/PS_FT.htm
regards,
Tim
 
Hi Tim,
PI's were originally used in archaeological surveys to look for buried walls, foundations and ancient pits; as well as metal objects. To do this, there has to be a contrast between the wall, pit etc. and the surrounding soil.
If the wall is limestone, for example, and it is buried in a magnetically mineralised soil, then there will be a contrast. The signal will drop as you go over the wall. A buried fired brick wall may have a higher iron mineralisation than the surrounding soil, and the signal will rise when the coil is over the wall.
These variations can be very small, and are only seen if a data logger is used and the results plotted out at the end of the survey; which has to be properly gridded.
Eric.
 
Top