Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Omega 10" coil and trash.

jim tn

Well-known member
I hit a couple of targets this morning that continues to reaffirm to me that the 10" elliptical coil does perform well in the trash.

My first good target this morning was located within about 4" or so of a 6" long piece of copper pipe. I kept getting high tone hits close together and the one was a good 84/85 and the other was 88/89. I was sure I knew what the 88/89 was, as it was a long target. The 84/85 from about 4" deep was a nice ornate sterling ring. The 88/89 was the copper pipe.

As it turned out, the last target I dug was a mid and high tone and numbers bounce of 50-54 and 82-84. I dug about a 5" deep plug and sticking out of the clod was a tab tail. Re-scanned the clod and got a hard high tone hit. That turned out to be a 79 Memorial cent and was on the other side of the clod, about 3" away from the tab tail and about 1" deeper.

Not to shabby a performance, IMHO. HH jim tn
 
YOU. Yes, it was good old Jim TN, just you, who made the correct decisions, not the coil and not the detector.

jim tn said:
I hit a couple of targets this morning that continues to reaffirm to me that the 10" elliptical coil does perform well in the trash.
I give credit to the coil as well as the detector. The narrow scan width of the elliptical 10" concentric coil helps separate good and bad targets, somewhat, just like some of the credit goes to the detector and circuitry which processes such information.

jim tn said:
My first good target this morning was located within about 4" or so of a 6" long piece of copper pipe. I kept getting high tone hits close together and the one was a good 84/85 and the other was 88/89. I was sure I knew what the 88/89 was, as it was a long target. The 84/85 from about 4" deep was a nice ornate sterling ring. The 88/89 was the copper pipe.
While an avid detectorist might be alerted to a potentially 'good target" about 4" from a possible trash target (a long-shaped object), many beginners or newcomers or just plain old lazy hobbyists might not discern the difference and could just ignore both signals. Maybe the sweep they make shows a broader spread of VDI numbers and that might suggest to them that it's not a nice-and-proper desired target.

A more devoted and avid detectorist, such a you, would be alert for partially masked good targets. Job well done.


jim tn said:
As it turned out, the last target I dug was a mid and high tone and numbers bounce of 50-54 and 82-84. I dug about a 5" deep plug and sticking out of the clod was a tab tail. Re-scanned the clod and got a hard high tone hit. That turned out to be a 79 Memorial cent and was on the other side of the clod, about 3" away from the tab tail and about 1" deeper.
Once again, I'll acknowledge that the detector and coil combination can do a fine job of responding to and conveying a 'blend' of mixed-metals near each other.

But the savvy reader and shopper for a good detector and coil should make more of a metal note that it is the detectorist, like YOU, who is ultimately responsible of making the right judgement call and the needed target recovery.


jim tn said:
Not to shabby a performance, IMHO. HH jim tn
Not shabby at all, it was great performance ... and the detector and coil didn't do too bad, either. :clapping:

Monte
 
Monte, thanks, you are a real charm. In a large part to you, I am really enjoying the Omega. Can't seem to put it down. HH jim tn
 
Top