Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

PI or VLF ?

A

Anonymous

Guest
Hello to everybody , i was wondering about a few posts that i read back down the list about the soveriegn detector and so i decided to post these thoughts after a discussion with a friend .
My first point is that minelab have never to my knowledge claimed that the BBS system was VLF and if you look at the output of the detector with a CRO all you see is a pulsetrain of squared pulses (strange eh!).
another point is that the machine has to be used just like a motion pulse detector ie: slow even swings , and lastly somebody asked the question about the multiple frequency claims and i was struck by the fact that a square shaped pulseform is actually a complex wave made up of many different frequencies and a decent square pulse can be manufactured from multiple freq's , as many as you like 17 , 27 ,67 etc .
what if you had a detector that produced multiple vlf sinewaves and created a complex wave that could be pulsed in the same way as a PI , it would allow for some different concepts for discriminators wouldnt it ?
The bottom line is that i dont think that the BBS machines are vlf or pure pulse induction but a hybrid concept .
Regards TJ. <img src="/metal/html/wink.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt=";)">
 
Top