Quattro and E ll?

[JJames1610]

I have been reading some older postings on these two detectors. One person had bought the Quattro and hunted with his friend who owned the explorer ll. He mentioned that he wished he had gotten one instead because it sounded off better on deeper fringe targets then his did. Is this true?

 

[John 71]

The Quattro is the pre runner to the safari. I thank the safari is under rated over the etrac. Lot easier to set up then etrac. I have a safari and use 8 inch coil and can get a dime at about 9 inches. I did have a se . I didn't see it any deeper.

 

[JJames1610]

Thanks

 

[sasquache]

My safari is a deep seeker i use a 5x10 sef dd coil it matches the depth of the stock 11 fbs coil with better trash seperation the only thing that hurts the Safari is bad ground it just nulls so what i do is run it all metal and notch out from iron to foil and i notch out 40 (deep iron) i may not get out all the big iron but at least i can hear the goodies. Just sunday at a really bad trash/iron laiden cellar hole i used my Safari with these settings and got a nice quarter size flat button screaming in between the iron/trash also this is a very noisy crazy loud way to hunt and i even have to take breaks just saying. Thank you Paul

 

[John 71]

I have a 8 inch concentric coil on it and it well go a little deeper then the 11 inch coil that is a double d. I thank on the larger coils that cover more area not more depth.