Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Ring ID's

A

all iron

Member
I have seen a lot of post asking what a ring might id and thought it would be interesting to see the responses based on what we have found or what we have on our fingers right now.
I took my ring off tonight and laid it on the ground and swept my coil over it and it came in at....

66-67

I'm not concerned with what type of ring or what size or even the detector settings just what it rang up at when the coil passes over it at about 4 inches.
I hope to see a lot of tight responses just as a coin on the ground would respond.
 
I found a titanium ring at the beach that showed a 53id, and a gold 24k that showed a 57id, both men's. Haven't found a silver one yet, but I did find what looks like a napkin ring, greyish silver, that shows a 89id, not sure if its platinum or what.
 
I'm not sure which machines, you guys are talking about, but I seem to remember digging dimes with my T-2, only to be surprised to find a silver ring. So 83 is what I would look for, for a silver ring with a T-2.
 
Mine is a gamma 6000
 
46/47....56/57 (2 found).....60/61......76-78. Gold ring finds/readings with the Omega. And size does make a difference as it does with silver rings. HH jim tn
 
I have heard that big gold class rings come in around the zinc penny ID numbers.
 
all iron said:
I have seen a lot of post asking what a ring might id and thought it would be interesting to see the responses based on what we have found or what we have on our fingers right now.
I took my ring off tonight and laid it on the ground and swept my coil over it and it came in at....

66-67

I'm not concerned with what type of ring or what size or even the detector settings just what it rang up at when the coil passes over it at about 4 inches.
I hope to see a lot of tight responses just as a coin on the ground would respond.
Click to expand...

I don't see the benefit or conclusions that can be derived from knowing only the numeric value of an item (laid on top of the ground and scanned with the coil about 4" above) without regard to more descriptive information other than the fact that it was "a ring" or the detector settings that contributed to the numeric reading.

Remember, the author said "not concerned with what type of ring or what size or even the detector settings. " The author himself gave only the numeric range and the fact that it was his ring....no other descriptive details.

ToddB64
 
all iron (and all members who might read my post of November 07, 2012 09:15PM),

My apology ! .. I misunderstood what was meant by "type".

After re-reading the thread-starter post again around noon today, I believe all iron was referring to the design and size......not that he wasn't concerned with other ring details such as gold and it's karat or silver and it's carat or the properties of other ring materials.

In view of the above, I was embarrassed :blush: and was going to erase my post, but it was too late to Edit.

ToddB64
 
Let me clarify what my intentions for this post were.
I wanted to illustrate how vase the ids of rings could be no mater whether they were 10k,18k 22k,silver 925
A cool ring found is a cool ring found no matter what its composition is or may be.
I guess i should clarify that we should not post rings made from bread ties :detecting: but even a spoon ring is a ring and it would be neat to know where that came in at / not that i'm asking to post spoon ring readings :goodnight:
so with that being said / our findings so far are
46-47
53
56-57
57
60-61
66-67
89
76-78
77-81
83
 
all iron said:
Let me clarify what my intentions for this post were.
I wanted to illustrate how vase the ids of rings could be no mater whether they were 10k,18k 22k,silver 925
A cool ring found is a cool ring found no matter what its composition is or may be.
I guess i should clarify that we should not post rings made from bread ties :detecting: but even a spoon ring is a ring and it would be neat to know where that came in at / not that i'm asking to post spoon ring readings :goodnight:
so with that being said / our findings so far are
46-47
53
56-57
57
60-61
66-67
89
76-78
77-81
83
Click to expand...

all iron,

Thanks for clarifying. :thumbup:

I guess that so far, we can conclude that various rings will produce numeric readings from 46 to 89.

BTW, In what context are you using the word "vase" ?......Sorry, but I don't know Latin or French. :help:

ToddB64
 
Man, your killing me :clapping:
I knew i misspelled that word.
I was referring to the possible great ranges rings could id at.
I think so far the readings illustrate how tight a response may be
I don't believe a ring would have readings ... lets say 53-86 / I believe all ring types will respond with a very tight numerical id response.
 
all iron said:
Man, your killing me :clapping:
I knew i misspelled that word.
I was referring to the possible great ranges rings could id at.
I think so far the readings illustrate how tight a response may be
I don't believe a ring would have readings ... lets say 53-86 / I believe all ring types will respond with a very tight numerical id response.
Click to expand...

all iron,

"I knew i misspelled that word"........ OK, let me guess :clsoedeyes:.....you meant to type "close"....right ?

Thanks,

ToddB64
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top