Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Sea hunter II ?

I did the comparison several years back. The large mono coil is great for covering a larger footprint, therefore covering a large area faster then a smaller area. The large DD coil will probably get you better depth then the large mono.
 
Wait a minute, is this chart saying that the smaller coil is deeper than the larger coil? Am i reading that right or wrong? I have always heard the larger coils would get better depth as well as more coverage.
 
Those are the results I got using the Infinium. Why they turned out like that, might be to the sensitivity of a smaller coil compared to a larger one. PI detectors are well known to punch through highly mineralized soils. They don't necessarily do well with air tests.
 
Has anyone tried the 10x14 mono coil against the smaller stock coil? If so did you get similar results? On the sea hunter II?
 
JJames1610 said:
How much more depth has anyone noticed going from the 8 inch coil to the 10x14 coil?
Click to expand...

Sea Hunter Mark II coils only.

On a coin size 1 1/8" -1 1/4" around 2" better depth with the 10x14" coil over the 8" coil .... these are just normal 75% Copper, 25% Nickel coins.

Larger items will give larger variation in depth.

Smaller items can favour the 8" coil in detection and depth over the 10x14" coil.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top