Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
Simplex-initial thoughts-some test targets
- Thread starter IowaRelic
- Start date
IowaRelic
Well-known member
I could add a couple other observations from my short time with it so far. It’s much more stable in its field mode than say the kruzer wearing the same size coil in it’s 2 tone mode, yet it seems to have the same depth roughly.
Also, for lack of better term, it has less what I’m calling iron resolution than the kruzer. In denser iron, the iron audio becomes somewhat jumbled. The recovery is good and fast in park 2. The iron segment just seems to blur up its reports. No complaints though yet as it seems to lock on to non ferrous pretty good amidst the iron.
simplex first full hunt tomorrow morning.
Also, for lack of better term, it has less what I’m calling iron resolution than the kruzer. In denser iron, the iron audio becomes somewhat jumbled. The recovery is good and fast in park 2. The iron segment just seems to blur up its reports. No complaints though yet as it seems to lock on to non ferrous pretty good amidst the iron.
simplex first full hunt tomorrow morning.
TerryEastTexas
Well-known member
Keep on trucking sir, let us know what you figure out. I like what you've found out so far.