Hi there William !
Like the other guys who've replied to your query, I can only make a suggestion as to what TDI stands for..
How about [size=large]T[/size]ime [size=large]D[/size]omain [size=large]I[/size]ndication , Indicator , or Induction.....?????????
Regardless of the end result in how you evaluate the target's response by present pulse induction principles, it basically can be shown to be dependant on a Time Domain function.
The reciprocal of Time Domain Analysis is Fourier Analysis..................
A target which is either resistive, inductive or a combination of those characteristics, reflects its presence back to the coil, both during, and after the transmission of the energy pulse.
If you take several samples the coil's 're-actions' during the time period involved, you can determine if there are any 'external' influences modifying the normal cycle of 'charging' the coil with magnetic energy and the subsequent period of dissipation in the damping resistor involved in a mono-loop system.
External influences can be due to target materials, ground, water, or electro magnetic interference.
The design skill required, is to eliminate or minimise as efficiently as is practicable, all signals other than that due to the desired target.
The White's TDI unit may utilise Eric Foster's methodology for ground elimination and iron rejection.
Forum pictures of the White's TDI show a 'co-axial' or dual loop coil configuration.
So, instead of a 'direct' or dc coupling from the transmission coil to the detection circuitry, the introduction of a secondary loop allows an alternative and probably more sophisticated method of extraction the signal.
So I will have to wait for its introduction here into the UK to evaluate what it has to offer that differs from Eric's own units.
Be assured, if its made by Whites it will be worth waiting for.....MattR.UK.