You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
The T[sup][size=small]2[/size][/sup] provides adequate TID reference for common coins, especially since I don't consider it to be intended mainly for coin-shooting tasks. To me, the T[sup][size=small]2[/size][/sup] is, and always has been, geared towards the avid detectorists and devoted relic hunter. By that, I mean the icon TID is adequate for the casual coin hunting task where coins are usually shallow and isolated enough to take advantage of it, and the numeric VDI works fine, but most users they are listening for an audio response and will investigate (recover) anything that is non-iron.rapidroy7 said:Anybody ever seen one, maybe put some heads together and make one?
COMMON coins are what most manufacturers will list, as a rule, because, as stated, TID was developed for the common, average, typical coin hunter. The ones who are after coins, mainly modern coins that will be located rather shallow (4" or less) and they intend to recover only coins and not trash. Keep in mind that visual TID is simply an added form of discrimination, and "discrimination" is just that. A method by which we can discriminate between desired and not-desired targets. Hobbyists, whether they get out fairly often or are just go detecting on rare occasion, do so because they are looking for coins, and most of the hobby-users prefer NOT to dig pull tabs and foil and other common trash.rapidroy7 said:The manual doesn't go to far out on the limb with id numbers of different targets,i don't know what old copper coins ,different size gold coins, micro-gold jewelry to large gold rings would id at?
Quite a bit of difference between the two other than just the visual display information. I actually find the T[sup][size=small]2[/size][/sup] to be more comfortable with similar-sized coils. If the Compadre had a larger coil mounted to compete with the 11" Bi-Axial DD, then, like all therapidroy7 said:wow Monte thanks for the knowledge i started a year ago with a compadre now have t2