Recently Dew has made a few comments about us needing to look for more reasons "to dig" -- instead of reasons "not to dig" -- and not relying on the Smart Screen or digital numbers so much. This got me thinking and I wondered if I was paying too much mind to the cursor position with my hunting. I decided to do a little experiment at a site I thought was starting to dry up for me. I had about an hour after work last night, so I headed to this particular site and hunted with the screen covered up -- basing my decision to dig solely on sound. In the 45 minutes that I hunted, I managed four Wheat cents (1914 -- no D
, 1919, and two 1945's) and a 1904 Indian Head cent -- all in the 5-7" range. I also picked up two 5" deep clad dimes that were on edge.
When I double checked the Smart Screen, after deciding to dig the targets, all but one of them hit on the screen where it would have probably kept me from digging them had the screen not been covered. Most of the targets also had iron in the hole, or very close to them, and sounded a little "iffy" -- but the warble was there. Another interesting point was that I only dug one trash target -- a small, rusty, twisted up nail (I would have sworn it was a silver dime before I dug it...LOL!).
Thanks, Dew, for getting me thinking about this. These are great machines, once you start to learn -- and trust -- what they're telling you.
HH,
Jeff


Thanks, Dew, for getting me thinking about this. These are great machines, once you start to learn -- and trust -- what they're telling you.
HH,
Jeff
