You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Critterhunter said:That article gives the most informative description of Iron Mask I've seen to date. It confirms what I've been saying for a long time. Iron Mask tries it's best to reveal a non-ferrous target mixed in with iron. It's not like a detector that is say set up to discriminate out iron, which will most of the time also reject the non-ferrous target as well. Once again, thanks for posting that.
Neil said:Critterhunter said:That article gives the most informative description of Iron Mask I've seen to date. It confirms what I've been saying for a long time. Iron Mask tries it's best to reveal a non-ferrous target mixed in with iron. It's not like a detector that is say set up to discriminate out iron, which will most of the time also reject the non-ferrous target as well. Once again, thanks for posting that.
It doesnt confirm anything and thats the problem with your reasoning. Its based on who you dont know, posting things you dont know, and sadly newbies who read that kinda garbage think it could be the truth.
That guy might never have even held a sovereign in his hands and just posted what he read. What in the world would incline you to believe that he knows what he is talking about?
scoper said:Hi Critterhunter,i don't think anybody ever said that the iron mask switch did nothing....but all it really does is expand the iron recognition range of the discrim.For example,if i take my basic c-scope single frequency detector and discrim out my 3"rusty test nail so there is absolutely no signal at all,the machine will find it difficult to locate one of my small hammered coins next to the nail when i sweep my coil over both targets.This is about where the sovereigns discrim setting is at "0" on the discrim knob.However,when i reduce the discrim on my c-scope just enough to get the slightest blip on the nail,the machine will quite easily pick up the hammered coin.This is in effect what happens when you switch the iron mask switch to on....it reduces the discrim to help good targets break through over the iron.This is why in the manual it says with iron mask on you may get the occasional beep over iron....it's because there is slightly less discrim.It also explains why you may get slightly more depth like it says in the manual....this happens when you reduce discrim.The manual also states that the threshold may be less stable with iron mask on and not so good in mineralised ground....here again these factors can be caused by using less discrim which in effect is what the iron mask switch does.When i repeat the nail test with the sovereign i still can't pick up the hammered coin even with iron mask on because it is not lowering the discrim enough for the low conductivity hammered to break through.....even with iron mask on the rusty nail will still not produce even the slightest beep.This is why in certain difficult conditions the sovereign is outperformed by high sensitivity fast reacting machines and why not many people use them over here for searching ancient iron littered sites.The sovereigns iron rejection is just too high over here,even with the iron mask on, which is why it would be better to have a full range discrim knob from small iron upwards rarther than a single switch which gives very limited control.I think that minelab have tried to be slightly too clever with the sovereign by providing the machine with the ability to ignore most ferous objects while still trying to provide it with the ability to find non ferous objects in amongst iron as well.To a certain extent they have succeeded because higher conductive coins can be found quite effectively in high iron trash areas....but when it comes to low conductive small hammered and roman coins in iron it's out of it's depth.If minelab added the full range discrim control and a switch for low/high recovery it would be even more popular than it is now over here in th u.k....maybe these will be the next features if minelab decide to update the sovereign.
Rick(ND) said:All the Sovereigns since the XS have the iron mask on all the time, but to make it easier for those new to the Sovereign they put a switch on the GT to turn off the iron mask making the detector run smoother and not so many false signals so those new to the Sovereign will be able to learn it faster. This also comes in handy for those that clad hunt and those that use a GT for competition hunting as you can swing the coil faster. I feel those that want the deeper coins and those that like to hunt the worked to death area we only run it with iron mask on as we want the coins that other detectors miss that is close to iron and deeper.
Rick
scoper said:Hi Critterhunter,i don't think anybody ever said that the iron mask switch did nothing....but all it really does is expand the iron recognition range of the discrim.For example,if i take my basic c-scope single frequency detector and discrim out my 3"rusty test nail so there is absolutely no signal at all,the machine will find it difficult to locate one of my small hammered coins next to the nail when i sweep my coil over both targets.This is about where the sovereigns discrim setting is at "0" on the discrim knob.However,when i reduce the discrim on my c-scope just enough to get the slightest blip on the nail,the machine will quite easily pick up the hammered coin.This is in effect what happens when you switch the iron mask switch to on....it reduces the discrim to help good targets break through over the iron.This is why in the manual it says with iron mask on you may get the occasional beep over iron....it's because there is slightly less discrim.It also explains why you may get slightly more depth like it says in the manual....this happens when you reduce discrim.The manual also states that the threshold may be less stable with iron mask on and not so good in mineralised ground....here again these factors can be caused by using less discrim which in effect is what the iron mask switch does.When i repeat the nail test with the sovereign i still can't pick up the hammered coin even with iron mask on because it is not lowering the discrim enough for the low conductivity hammered to break through.....even with iron mask on the rusty nail will still not produce even the slightest beep.This is why in certain difficult conditions the sovereign is outperformed by high sensitivity fast reacting machines and why not many people use them over here for searching ancient iron littered sites.The sovereigns iron rejection is just too high over here,even with the iron mask on, which is why it would be better to have a full range discrim knob from small iron upwards rarther than a single switch which gives very limited control.I think that minelab have tried to be slightly too clever with the sovereign by providing the machine with the ability to ignore most ferous objects while still trying to provide it with the ability to find non ferous objects in amongst iron as well.To a certain extent they have succeeded because higher conductive coins can be found quite effectively in high iron trash areas....but when it comes to low conductive small hammered and roman coins in iron it's out of it's depth.If minelab added the full range discrim control and a switch for low/high recovery it would be even more popular than it is now over here in th u.k....maybe these will be the next features if minelab decide to update the sovereign.