4KHz finds.

[doug turner]

4 KHz, now that

 

[Schultzie]

It seems to be working nicely for you.

 

[Larry (IL)]

You did very well with it. I have tried 4 kHz several times and I always have had to go back to 7.7 where I got a lot cleaner signal even though I might be losing a little depth. I tried many different settings but 4kHz audio was still a little "muddied" to me.

 

[Ray-Mo.]

I am thinking 4KHz will be great for hunting larger targets/relics/caches at greater depths.It seems to not suffer from lack of sharp response on bigger/broader targets.

 

[doug turner]

I am thinking 4KHz will be great for hunting larger targets/relics/caches at greater depths.It seems to not suffer from lack of sharp response on bigger/broader targets.

From my very limited experiences with the 4 KHz that frequency seems to favour the bigger targets at the expense of the smaller ones?

18 KHz. These next finds, taking out of the equation the total numbers, a smaller range of finds?(bottom left.)

 

[cypearl]

As far as i know khz works for target seperation. the lowest for bigger targets and the highest for smaller, depends on what coil you use at the time also.

 

[targets]

i was in a trashy area yesterday and it was noisy in 18 ,so i quickly tuned to 4 and it was a lot quieter and easier to find coins.
using GMP prog.
you can always tune another frequency on the fly .