Bigtom123 said:
I was just messing with it in the house, I didn't have the upper rod out as far as it would go, it's pretty tight and I didn't pull hard enough to get it out all the way...all good now, thanks for the reply.
Glad you have that adjusted well now.
Bigtom123 said:
On another note, did some ID checks...very good ID spread on the simplex.
Indian head penny. 55 .. Large gold class ring 55
Zinc 67. Wheat 76
Small woman's gold ring. 20
Yes, the Target ID spread is very good. My Nokta CoRe and Makro Racer [size=small]
(the original 'Red' version)[/size] have a Ferrous/Non-Ferrous break-point of '40' but I was used to that setting from other detectors I had used. The FORS Relic and Racer 2 came out in early 20016 and the Relic has a Ferrous/Non-Ferrous break-point of '20' but the Racer 2 uses a break-point at '10.' With both models you have a wider spread for Non-Ferrous targets.
But with a 'Normalized' Ferrous-/Non-Ferrous break-point of '15' withy the Impact, Multi-=Kruzer and Anfibio Multi, I felt it was just about ideal to give enough zone for iron-based junk and a really useful spread for Non-Ferrous targets. The Simplex + follows that same concept with a '15' numeric break-point.
Just a reminder for readers who might be newer to Coin Hunting and our USA coin composition regarding Target ID's. Most of the Indiana Head Cents will have a lower-conductivity reading that is similar to the modern Zinc Cent. Also, many of the very early Wheat-back Cents, from 1909 to about 1920 will also have a lower numeric read-out similar to Zinc and Indian Head Cents.
Also, if someone gets involved in going after more gold jewelry, be sure to use a LOT of test samples, and do them both as if laying flat-to-the-coil or on-end or canted. They can read very low, just at the verge or Iron, and on up with many bigger men's rings falling in the range of a Nickel, or 5¢ piece, on up through Pull Tabs ... or higher. I have found two 24 K women's rings that locked-on a 1¢/10¢ VDI read-out.
Monte