http://brooklynpaper.com/stories/32/5/32_5_mm_metal_heads.html
Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Bad apples ruin it for others! :(
- Thread starter Mike from MI "Iron Brigade"
- Start date
Pete in MI
New member
They had the offender, talked to the offender and yet let him go??? The parks woman said if she had more people to enforce laws she could have had him thrown out. Duh, do they not have police officers in Brooklyn who could have issued him a citation for destruction of property?
The one guy is right....knee jerk reaction to solve a problem. 357 people + are good people and they have noi problem with them doing what is right and one idiot gets away with destruction of property and destruction of the public relations between detectorists and the parks personnel. Definitely wrong on many points. I hope the good one provide a united front and do so in a good manner and they can get the city council or whoever is over the parks system to step back and rethink their reactionary decision.
Praying for a good turn out for all on this situation.
The one guy is right....knee jerk reaction to solve a problem. 357 people + are good people and they have noi problem with them doing what is right and one idiot gets away with destruction of property and destruction of the public relations between detectorists and the parks personnel. Definitely wrong on many points. I hope the good one provide a united front and do so in a good manner and they can get the city council or whoever is over the parks system to step back and rethink their reactionary decision.
Praying for a good turn out for all on this situation.
A
Anonymous
Guest
What about the other abusers of the park that she claimed were destroying areas and had to watch them, are they still able to use the Public Parks, the same as others, except the detectorists?? Get together and protest your city and county taxes until YOU, also, can use the parks for your hobbies and good exercise! Very unfair to single out those who want to help finance their incomes and enjoy the outdoors in their detecting hobby! Public means public....for everyone's reasonable use! DISCRIMINATION for some but not others using the parks! UNFAIR, UNFAIR and, again, I say, 'UNFAIR"! Poor excuses for the park keepers to make that they need more policemen....Hire more plice and park caretakers and put people to work in this downtrodden economy! 
God Bless! Betty
God Bless! Bettymohayes1046
New member
In doing so we could establish ourselves with the city as NOT the ones causing the problems. Also, we could police ourselves in those parks when we have an individual who insists on being a pain and causing us grief by not filling in his holes and confronting him, preferably with two or more people, with the problems he is causing all of us.
Idealistic, yes, but we have to come up with some solution that will show we are also concerned about the vandalism that is taking place in our parks and want to help correct the problem by sweat equity.
Mark
Idealistic, yes, but we have to come up with some solution that will show we are also concerned about the vandalism that is taking place in our parks and want to help correct the problem by sweat equity.
Mark
Mike Chgo area
Well-known member
n/t