You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
At first this reads as a throw-away comment to be ignored, but it actually sums up how I feel about battlefield (At least ancient UK ones) detecting. I think that history is only useful if we remember it correctly. All war is horrible and battles are the epicentre of wars (usually). To find a civil war bullet in the USA is to remind yourself that a nation fought itself to do something right and that both good and bad people died doing what they thought was right. It also helps people to remember that it wasn't all hollywood, fake blood and romantic.gmanlight said:Yes i would like to hunt a battlefield and while detecting i might find a bullet that
might have ended a young mans life.
I could respect the one who shot it as well as the one who it landed upon.
fenian13 said:Is a grave "sacred" even if the person was a scumbag child molester?
Is Battlefield ground only considered "sacred" when someone famous like Stonewall Jackson gets maimed, or where Reynolds was killed. Would you dig those spots if law allowed or do you have too much respect for them because they were famous?
Is the place private Smith died not "sacred" too? Gonna dig up the place he died cuz he was a nobody, just cannon fodder?