Critterhunter
New member
Not looking to start a flame war. Just curious as to your reason's why you opted for the SE over the Etrac, as I may add one or the other to my line up down the road. After playing with a friend's Etrac I'd have to wonder if the SE would be a better option for me to consider now. I'm not a fan of the way everything gets compressed into the 12th line on the Etrac. Makes no sense to me why they would do that. I have owned three Explorer II's in the past. The discrimination pattern the Explorer uses seems to make much more sense. I hear the Etrac is a bit better in trash than the SE (if using the same size coil) but that depth is on par with each other for the most part.
Then again, I liked the weight of the Etrac. The SE I would expect to be heavier and of course to have the less comfortable angle of the hand grip like the older Explorers. I guess though it'd be lighter than my previous Explorers were thanks to the Pro Coil on the SE, and I could probably fit a lipo in the battery holder to drop some more weight. May have to consider an SE unless somebody can argue why the Etrac is the better machine to them. In particular I'd like to hear why you think the discrimination pattern the Etrac uses has any advantages over the Explorer style.
Then again, I liked the weight of the Etrac. The SE I would expect to be heavier and of course to have the less comfortable angle of the hand grip like the older Explorers. I guess though it'd be lighter than my previous Explorers were thanks to the Pro Coil on the SE, and I could probably fit a lipo in the battery holder to drop some more weight. May have to consider an SE unless somebody can argue why the Etrac is the better machine to them. In particular I'd like to hear why you think the discrimination pattern the Etrac uses has any advantages over the Explorer style.