Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Corbyn's VS modern us army landmine detector (NATO an-pss-12)

A

Anonymous

Guest
Hi everybody,
I've found a document that describes the timings and internal block diagrams of the us army standard landmine detector AKA nato an/pss-12 , actually a schiebel (from austria) model of pulse induction metal detector. The document available from ieee :
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/ 36/19440/00898665.pdf?arnumber=898665
Well...if you check the timing diagrams you can see that the pss-12 uses the same reverse pulsing as in the corbyn with actually about 120 us for each pulse, so first a 120 us pulse (positive) then a second (negative) pulse of 120 us, with some little delay between the first and the second (about 20 us). I think that the reason for using this pulsing scheme is to improve the S/N ratio, as in Corbyn's PI article, and to definitely cancel ground and target magnetization.
The receiver uses another coil , as in corbyn's but mono-coil (smaller, concentric, coplanar than the tx coil) and is completely different from any traditional pi, I mean there is not an analog integrator, either single or double (differential), the way I know. What you can see is a 'threshold' detector that inits the receiver front end sampling ,when it detecteds that the received signal reach 1.5 volts starting from 0 volts after the last tx switch-off; then after a delay of 10us a 10us window sample is taken (this is the signal sample) and passed to a sample-hold; then after about 15us of delay another sampling is done till the next tx switch-on and it's used to take an 'average' no-target level...then passed to another sample-hold. The two sample hold drive a difference amplifier that controls the audio generator for output. The rx part is, at the end, a different kind of difference 'integrator' but with sampling capabilities.
I think that pss-12 uses a mosfet h-bridge to switch the tx coil back and forward, but I'm not sure of that.
So I think that it will be interesting to study the document above...also to try to figure out some ne wer schematic or project about PI.
Best regards,
jetstream
 
Hi Jetstream,
How do you access the information, without subscribing to the IEEE?
I had an AN/PSS-12 a few years ago. The purpose of the bipolar TX pulses is to ensure that there is no net magnetic field from the coil, which could trigger a sensitive magnetically activated fuze on a mine.
The concentric TX/RX coil reduces the effect of surface iron mineralisation, although there is no actual ground cancelling circuitry.
Having done some tests on this detector, I personally would rate my chances to be better with the Goldquest SS in mine hunting.
Eric.
 
Hi Eric,
I found that document on a website different from the ieee one, but don't remember exactly where it is ...anyway I'm trying to put the .pdf file in attachment to this message, as if it was an image ! In the textual description it's not explained if the double switching is required to avoid magnetic fuses injection or just to improve S/N, but know I think that this sequence of pulses are for both reasons (it's definitly true what you mentioned about fuses ignition... i just forgot that pss-12 is, first of all, a landmine detector).
But what's really interesting is the receiver system that uses three sample-and-hold circuits and difference amplifiers instead of analog integrators as many other PI detectors.
I agree that coplanar/concentric coils are for better pinpointing that's truly important in mine detectors.
To read the file you must rename it removing the trailing '.jpg' (so adobe acrobat reader can work with it).
Please let me know if you can open the .pdf file.
Best regards,
Jetstream
 
Hi Eric,
I found that document on a website different from the ieee one, but don't remember exactly where it is ...anyway I'm trying to put the .pdf file in attachment to this message, as if it was an image ! In the textual description it's not explained if the double switching is required to avoid magnetic fuses injection or just to improve S/N, but know I think that this sequence of pulses are for both reasons (it's definitly true what you mentioned about fuses ignition... i just forgot that pss-12 is, first of all, a landmine detector).
But what's really interesting is the receiver system that uses three sample-and-hold circuits and difference amplifiers instead of analog integrators as many other PI detectors.
I agree that coplanar/concentric coils are for better pinpointing that's truly important in mine detectors.
To read the file you must rename it removing the trailing '.jpg' (so adobe acrobat reader can work with it).
Please let me know if you can open the .pdf file.
Best regards,
Jetstream
 
Hi Jetstream,
Can't find the file...please try again...we're very interested in seeing what you mean, and we're not all registered engineers so don't have access to IEEE.
Thanks
Kev.
 
Hi Jetstream,
Congratulation
Can't find the file...please try again...I'm very interested in seeing what you mean, and not all registered engineers so don't have access to IEEE.
Best Regards.
Ben Hur.
 
Hi Jetsteam,

Can you kindly send me this article from IEEE too. I don't have access to it.

Thanks Chris
 
Top