Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Detector history question :

Tom_in_CA

Active member
Even though detectors have been around since the 1930s (and even earlier), yet all the early decade's machines were only capable of finding large sized objects. Not coin sized objects.

So for example, even though Fisher Co. perpetually touts that they've been around since the mid 1930s, that was all just 2-box style. And even to the extent that they had some conventional rod-&-loop styles by the late 1950s (?), yet even those would have been hard-pressed to find coin-sized targets.

So all the early kinds might have been fine for finding land-mines or caches, or industrial/commercial purposes (eg.: hubcap and jar and pipe sized items), yet were not sensitive enough to find coin-sized items.

When did that change ? What were the first machines (in common use that is, not fluke experimentals) that could do it ?

I read somewhere that there was a certain mine detector that came out during the Korean conflict (very early '50s) that was indeed capable of finding coins. Like to get a quarter at a good 6" or something (albeit probably a bear to keep balanced). And even though it wasn't designed for that purpose, yet it was capable of doing it, if someone had wanted.

But barring a few fluke stories like that, you really don't see the hobby of hunting for individual coins taking off till the early 1960s. And even then-so, very geographically limited. Entire areas of the USA never saw a detector in their parks and schools till the late 1960s or early 1970s.

So what is the earliest accounts of coin-hunting that you've heard of ? And what machines were they using ? And what were they capable of ?

Here in CA, I talked to a guy who had graduated from High School, in Napa, CA, in 1959. He distinctly recalled seeing a fellow with a metal detector in one of the old parks there. And distinctly recalled that he was still in High school at the time (hence it was '58 or '59-ish). He stopped and watched the fellow for a bit. And distinctly recalled that he was digging coins (ie.: not just big targets). He could not recall what machine the guy was swinging though. Years later, in the late 1960s, or early '70s, he recalled that encounter, and went to get a machine of his own.
 
do you have ITMD copy?
 
uuuhhh, what does ITMD stand for ? :shrug:
 
Tom_in_CA said:
uuuhhh, what does ITMD stand for ? :shrug:

I wondered that too !! ???????????????????????????
 
Hello.
Think kt315 is talking about >> inside the Metal Detector <<.

All the Best
 
ok, thanx. Maybe that's it. Does Carl's book dedicate much space to the question of the years/machines in which coin hunting became possible for detectors ? (as opposed to only large objects)
 
Hello Tom.

Why not sending Carl-NC a p.m. asking him self for some details?
Personally I didn't read the book but may be Santa will bring a copy this year. Ho Ho Ho...

All the Best & Good Luck
 
The earliest detector that was of the rod and round loop design was probably a mine detector...not very sensitive to coins during WW11 but the design was out there. Later the concept of the rod and round loop design was probably copied and made lighter by either Fisher with their T-10 and the White's had a model with 2 meters maybe called the Prospector. There may have been another rod and round loop design with another now obsolete detector manufacturer but the name escapes me for me now.
 
Joe(TX) said:
The earliest detector that was of the rod and round loop design was probably a mine detector...not very sensitive to coins during WW11 but the design was out there....

thanx for your input Joe.

To my knowledge, those used for WWII (at least the ones Americans made) could not pick up any items smaller than a soda-can sized. And even at that ... quite clumsy. Difficult to keep balanced, not consistent, etc...

From what I heard, it wasn't till the Korean war that a mine detector was made that was sensitive enough to find coin sized targets. Naturally, that wasn't its intended purpose. It was designed to find landmines, of course. But I just read somewhere that it was noted that it was sensitive enough to pick up a USA quarter to something like 5 or 6" or whatever.

There are also accounts of how the fellow who started Kellyco, who was operating those Korean conflict mine-detectors, used that type , for hobbyist purposes, when he got back to civilian life. And he did indeed find coins. Also CW hunters adapting that Korean era detector listed "bullets" among their finds. If it could find bullets, then, obviously coins are about the same size.

Even though that would push the ability to do "coin-shooting" to as early as the early 1950s, yet ... it was not till the early 1960s, at the earliest, that it caught on in any appreciable #'s. There might have been some geographic exceptions to this. But I know that even up to the early 1970s, there were tales of virgin parks and schools in some geographic areas.
 
Even the best BFO's couldn't do much. But, with silver coinage and sites not having been previously searched, even 3 inches of depth was enough to be useful.

The high frequency induction balance so-called "TR's" started to get popular I think late 50's - early 60's. Good ones will go maybe 5-7 inches in light mineralization and do a good job of knocking out iron. Unfortunately iron mineralization really cuts your depth. However (apart from ground balanced PI units) they're still the best machines for "bed of nails" iron infested sites.

The big game-changer was VLF with ground balance. They've been around since WW2, but didn't have appreciable impact on the the hobby market until the early 1970's. Most of those early units would air test in the 7 - 9 inch range, and when ground balanced would do nearly as well in most soils.

VLF-TR discrimination soon followed, not nearly as good as high frequency TR but still useful. The early 1980's saw the introduction of motion discriminators based on multiplying two second derivative signals, which is the foundation of VLF metal detector technology even today.
 
Look at the big brain on Dave J. thanks for the info


Dave J. said:
Even the best BFO's couldn't do much. But, with silver coinage and sites not having been previously searched, even 3 inches of depth was enough to be useful.

The high frequency induction balance so-called "TR's" started to get popular I think late 50's - early 60's. Good ones will go maybe 5-7 inches in light mineralization and do a good job of knocking out iron. Unfortunately iron mineralization really cuts your depth. However (apart from ground balanced PI units) they're still the best machines for "bed of nails" iron infested sites.

The big game-changer was VLF with ground balance. They've been around since WW2, but didn't have appreciable impact on the the hobby market until the early 1970's. Most of those early units would air test in the 7 - 9 inch range, and when ground balanced would do nearly as well in most soils.

VLF-TR discrimination soon followed, not nearly as good as high frequency TR but still useful. The early 1980's saw the introduction of motion discriminators based on multiplying two second derivative signals, which is the foundation of VLF metal detector technology even today.
 
Dave J. said:
.... The early 1980's saw the introduction of motion discriminators based on multiplying two second derivative signals, which is the foundation of VLF metal detector technology even today.


1977, to be exact. That was when Reb Baron first advertised their "SPD". Soon to be followed, in 1978, by Whites and their 6000D

But it's probably just as accurate to say "early 1980s". Because it took another year or two to catch on anywhere. Evolution (acceptance within md'ing ranks) was much slower to evolve in those days. D/t there was no internet lightening-fast communication/comparisons.

Also, since the way the motion discriminators were swung was SO counter-intuitive, there was initial reluctance, on many people's parts, to adopt them. So despite their technical introduction in 1977 to '78, the first I ever recall actually seeing on in-the-field, was about 1980. And initially, we laughed at the guy behind his back. Since it was obvious he was swinging the coil wrong. But ... after we saw his silver tallies from the worked out parks, we stopped laughing, and quietly went out and bought our own motion discriminators. Doh !
 
My very first MD was a surplus WWII mind detector. At age 13 this thing weighed about as much as I did back in 1969. I dug my first relic ever with it, a blown piece of Hotchkiss artillery shell. I still have this piece in my display case.
 
I really think the huge development was the elimination of vacuum tubes, once you went solid state you got something you could swing and could practically be run on batteries. A WWII era mine detector was also a tube unit but was hardly a recreational device, Confetrit - you have my admiration! Vacuum tubes and portable electronics did come together for a while but never with the popularity that transistors allowed. I have also heard of some old BFO units that were tube based being used to locate caches of coins in the walls of buildings and such - I believe these caches were referred to as "Depression Banks".
 
Top