larryk56 said:
I just hunt coin and jewelry.... and I am thinking that perhaps I should just go back and consider the White M6.
If you're just into Coin & Jewelry Hunting and working the typical urban sites, then you are mainly going to be dealing with a lot of modern trash. Modern trash includes a good amount of smaller foil, larger foil, older ring-pull type tabs and modern rectangular pry-tabs, and all sorts of other non-ferrous debris. There will be some iron discards to deal with, but nothing on the level that an avid Relic Hunter is going to encounter. There have been and are now many detectors that are fully capable of providing very good performance for both Coin Hunting as well as Relic Hunting, and the White's M6 is just one of them. It can be very efficient especially if using the smaller 6" Concentric coil that works well in and around metal structures, fences, meter boxes and the like. And for most 'average' urban Coin Hunting applications you will still get ample detection depth.
larryk56 said:
Money is not the object but simplicity rules and just want a good detector that is easy to use and does great with jewelry but I don't want just a beep and dig machine.
There are three things that I have always taken into consideration when buying a detector, and I have held fast to this rule most of the time since 1971. That is this: I like to keep things 'Simple' and have controls and features that are 'Functional' but not excessive and confusing, and at the same time a detector and coil combination that provides me the level of 'Performance' I need to hunt a variety of challenging sites.
I currently have thirteen detectors in my Regular-Use Detector Team. All of them, including the trusty White's XLT and the 'modern' selectable-frequency Nokta Impact and Makro Multi-Kruzer, are 'Simple.' There are two non-Target ID, non-Tone ID Tesoro's, and my other single-frequency TID/Tone-ID Nokta CoRe and Relic, Makro Racer 2, White's MXT All-Pro and MX-7's. Every one of these are 'Simple' to use, and easy to set up with basic 'Functional' features and not a lot of fluff. All of them are proven to me to provide ample 'Performance' in the various sites I feel they are a good pick to handle the conditions.
larryk56 said:
Problem is, the M6 is heavier and wish it was lighter.
It seems you're kind of partial to White's metal detectors, and I can't fault you for that. I liked the M6 and used one quite a bit, but felt the 'balance' wasn't as comfortable as the MXT Pro with the different rod/grip/box location designs they had. I did, however, quickly take to the MX-5 when it was released and found that it got slightly better depth than the M-6, rivaled my MXT Pro for all-around versatility, and was much more comfortable and better balanced for me.
I have a number of physical health issues and my mobility stinks. I have had a cane to help me get around since March of '93 so I am finishing a quarter-century of impaired detecting mobility.... but I still tough it out as best I can. To do so, it's important for me to be attentive of the detectors weight and balance. It's aided by using smaller-than-stock search coils, but that's no issue for me. I have been using small to mid-sized search coils on factory-produced detectors 95% of the time since about '71 or '72.
The MX-5 is a favorite detector for many avid hobbyists and I know several Forum posters on here also like the MX-5, and they are affordable, too. I've seen choice condition/as-new MX-5's for sale for under $300 on Findmall and elsewhere, and that's is a killer price on a very decent performing detector. Lighter and better balanced than the M-6 with more modes and functions, yet 'simple.'
Monte