MarkCZ
Well-known member
SteveP(NH) said:Mark you missed my main point. Doing comparative depth testing in air isn't going to provide accurate results. The original poster did airtests of different F75 modes and offers them up as an comparison of the relative merits of each mode. My point is that airtesting say plowed field mode in air on a coin isn't valid. My experience is in a freshly plowed corn field you will have better results than using de mode for instance, an airtest won't be able to duplicate those results.
I agree, but what Ron is showing has nothing to with depth, what he was trying to show is how the different modes are affected differently when changing 'Only' the discrimination control. In his illustration he charted using a number system just how the electronics are responding. In his chart and in his number system and forget its in inches, just call it "score". what the score is showing us is the discrimination control does things a little different in different modes,
So, now that Ron's score system charts those differences its more knowledge to the user to maybe dial up something better for use in any field condition.
Its a score chart, not a difference in depth chart.
Nor is it a Depth comparison for the different modes.
At home he worked with what he had!
He was using inches out from the coil and the differences without changing the sensitivity, but only changing the discrimination control distance from the coil increased in some modes even though the discrimination was Increased! but not in all modes! Some modes changing the discrimination had No affect at ALL!
His chart just used numbers as slide rule so a person can see it!
For some reason we're stuck on the title thread being a depth comparison! he wasn't even working on depth, depth wasn't the project, the project consisted of providing a visual chart for us to see what the discrimination control does to the sensitivity in EACH mode,
A loss,
A gain,
No Change,
In ALL Modes!
Mark