Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Equinox I.D. ?

cedarswamp

Active member
I have two Morgan silver dollars one an 1885 the other 1897 the 1885 was dug a few years ago with the etrac the 1897 was a gift.Decided to check the id on the nox 800 the 1885 read 32 and the 1897 read 26 does anybody have the reason?.....CEDAR
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0874.jpg
    IMG_0874.jpg
    133.3 KB · Views: 91
The rim/edge looks heavier/wider on the 85. Or, maybe its just the shot angle. Do they weigh close to the same? I frequently have well worn silver coins of the same denomination I d 2-3 numbers less then less wear ones, but your 85 just has a heavier, slightly thicker look to it to my old eyes. I have a 1883 I dug back in Jan that weighs 25.9 grams and has a bit more wear then yours. 6 points between your two to me seems a little to much. HH jim tn
 
That seems quite low of an ID on both of them in my opinion.
I have two or three of them that I bought some years ago… I will test them and let you know the results.
 
I have an 1883, 1898, and 1921 Morgan dollar and I tested them a few minutes ago.
using Park 1 with the stock coil and just air testing them, they all read 37/38.
If you have another coil, you might try testing them with it.. I think your coil could be bad.
 
Tested again with stock coil and coiltek 5x10 numbers about the same read one didget higher with the stock coil also tested with the T2 it read do i hav94 on the 1885 and 88 on the 1897. The 1885 wieghed 400.8 grains the 1897 340.1 grains Im confused to yes i kept the coins flat heres pics note 1885 read higher do i have a counter fit,,,,,CEDAR
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0876.jpg
    IMG_0876.jpg
    56.6 KB · Views: 81
  • IMG_0878.jpg
    IMG_0878.jpg
    59.3 KB · Views: 76
Tested again with stock coil and coiltek 5x10 numbers about the same read one didget higher with the stock coil also tested with the T2 it read do i hav94 on the 1885 and 88 on the 1897. The 1885 wieghed 400.8 grains the 1897 340.1 grains Im confused to yes i kept the coins flat heres pics note 1885 read higher do i have a counter fit,,,,,CEDAR
Counterfeit on the 28 gets my vote. A silver Washington quarter wouldn't read that low.
 
To me, the 1885 seems to have more wear than the 1897, but you state that the 1885 weighs more.
Normal weight should be 412.5 grains/26.73 grams which is close to your 1885.
Something could be not quite right about that 1897 coin.
 
Top