Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

First try at All metal hunting with the SE... long

Knipper

Active member
After all the posts by those whom I consider to be very accomplished and expert detector operators, I had to try the all-metal settings today.

For my site, I picked an old (for this area) fairgrounds that has beautiful grass and nice black dirt all the way down. Its a large area, so though its been pounded by many over the years, the sheer size of it tells me there's some deep goodies left.

I used the stock 10" coil with the following settings...

Iron mask at -32 (all metal), display in smart mode, primarily smartfind, not digital.

Sensitivity 17-18, manual (this was the highest I could set it because of ground conditions...don't think its too mineralized, but TRASH or whatever caused some instability.

Gain at 7 (see above)

Deep mode on

Ferrous response mode

Threshold Tone at 4

target pitch variation level set at 9 - (more on this later)

Threshold-just audible

Volume-10

I think that's about it for settings....


The first thing I noticed after doing the noise channel select, and taking my first scan, was the sound of a bass sax playing flight of the bumblebee! This area is LOADED with iron. I suspect they are deep, old wire fence fragments and nails from stock pens long gone...(since the 1860's). I proved this later by digging a few (8+ inches down). It was a real wake up call, literally! Had I been in discriminate, there would have been very few sweeps where I could have heard the threshold or anything else due to nulling. It took a few hours for me to train my ears to regard the iron sound as just another 'background noise' of no consequence, and start listening for any high pitched sounds in between or next to them. I think I'll call this "Detector Zen" from now on, as it takes a lot of concentration....

At first it seemed like the high pitch good signals were frequent too, but I later realized that many were long spike type nails. The cursor didn't want to to lock on and moved from left upper to right upper corners, back and forth. A quick check on digital showed 31-31 (I'm not used to Ferrous sounds yet). I soon learned to pass these up, as no amount of wiggling or angle manipulation would find a stable reading (a few dug targets confirmed the deep nail suspicion).

I went slow due to the multitude of target responses, and did get the occasional shallow clad. (I passed up shallow cents today to get more time to find the deep ones...only dug quarter signals).

I finally got the signal I was looking for. It was deep, high pitched and I really had to work to segregate it from surrounding trash. I pinpointed and dug a deep plug (because I'm optimistic!). A second scoop of nice black soil was taken out and I was now down about 8-9 inches. I use a Uniprobe pinpointer that has excellent depth and put this toward the bottom of the hole. This time I got the squeal in the center of the hole instead of the side (usually a nail). Another table spoon of soil was removed and I saw the small green disk. Pretty heavily caked it was, but after brushing off some of the crust I could see the date 1885 on the Indian head cent. Always look in the hole after you find one...I always do. Got another squeal with the probe, and this time, another half inch down was...a three inch long rusty nail!

After 4 hours of hunting, like this, I called it a day and drove back the 60 miles home.

My impressions of all metal hunting are as follows:

1. Its going to take more practice and discipline to concentrate on ignoring iron and listening for those in-between signals.

2. This method of hunting IS effective in trashy areas! No way would I have found that I.H. cent with any other machine I know of, or in a discrimination mode. It COULD have been a seated dime!

3. Putting the target pitch level at 9 does a better job at separating the iron from good sounds, but that high level pitch is irritating to me, and it sounds much fainter to my old ears than level 8. 8 is not as high a pitch, but quite a bit louder to me. (will the pros tell me 8 will work OK too?)

4. As stated by some experts here, the stock 10" coil may be too hot for this method in very heavy trash. I've ordered both the 12" and 4 x 7.5" Excelerator coils, and I think they will be more stable, with greater depth at higher sensitivity levels. Anyway, I HOPE so, as I don't have a lot of money to experiment by acquiring all kinds of coils. I don't think the 8" stock coil would have found this deep target either, but I haven't used it much.

5. With practice, and a different coil, I think I could be very optimistic about visiting old sites again, and getting the deep ones. Fortunately, not all have this level of iron trash, but on the other hand, the trash that's there is probably what will allow me to find what has been left behind by others, so....good trade!

Thanks to all who've shared their experience on all metal hunting here. I was hesitant to try it but its something that CAN be mastered and is going to be a very productive way to hunt from now on...

Knipper
 
Knipper,

Hunt this way for a couple of days and all that bass sax will fade away. Pretty soon you will get to the point where a null drive you nuts, not the constant drum of iron targets.

Sensitivity at 17-18 to be stable probably means there are power lines about. Perhaps when you get farther away see if you can tweak it up a bit. I'm a firm believer in Higher Sens = deeper targets -MOST of the time, but when you are starting out in all metal a stable detector is probably more helpful to climb the learning curve.

The 4.5x7 and 8 round probably have about the same depth and other characteristics, in moist ground with little ground cover they might have got that IH. The larger coils sometimes have the ability to see good targets in even fairly heavy iron that the smaller ones miss. Much more difficult if there is alot of higher conductivity trash about.

As far as I know from reading these forums for many years; no one that has mastered open screen or close to open has gone back to using discrimination except for very special occasions; Anyone disagree?

Chris
 
Forgot to mention...

In this heavy trash, digital read out was not very consistent, when switched to for a quick check. Also, when I switched to pinpoint, the numbers jumped around quite a bit as well, but on coins, stayed in the 'general vicinity' of read outs I'd gotten used to seeing. Is this typical in heavy trash? I would assume so, but I've never hunted like this before.

Knipper
 
Since you are in all metal there is no nulling to be concerned with. I run with no threshold at all. It's nice and quiet until you pass over something. I find I like it better this way.
 
You say you drove 60 miles to this site , well first let me say i live in the UK ,and that petrol here is heading towards
 
Petrol here, where I live, is at $3.10 per gallon, or a about a Pound and a half. To answer your question, if it were $10 per Gallon, I would have to limit the number of trips I took, yes. But I would somehow try to budget for them. (How much of that 5 pounds per Gallon is tax, for you?)

Knipper
 
Jeff and Maria,

I will always use a barely audible threshold. Here's why. When you adjust the machine so no threshold is audible, you never really know how far into the "silent zone" you are. A signal has to make up the gap between the silence and just being audible, before it can be heard. That means that some deep, faint signals will not come through for you, and those are the signals that mean deep old coins.

Its going to take some effort to mentally tune out all those iron responses coming from my headphones, but I think it will be worth the effort.

Knipper
 
75% OF THE PRICE OF PETROL IN THE UK IS TAX. Now i don't want to appear arrogant in any way here so please forgive me , but i find it unbelievable to even contemplate travelling a 120 mile round trip to find only a penny like the guy who posted the message here did!.. I mean if you are so serious about metal detecting then their is nothing wrong with it , go ahead and enjoy it by all means.
I have been forced off the road almost by massive petrol prices here in the uk and cannot afford to travel by car to sites more than a few miles away. I get on a long run maybe 25 -30 mpg so a 120 mile round trip would probably use about 5 gallons give or take a bit depending on traffic. 5 gallons at about
 
Yes, and cigarettes are 5 pounds a pack too! I know because I've detected over there in the UK. Food at restaurants is high etc.

But I didn't travel all that way just to find one corroded Indian Head Cent! I went to that site because I felt it afforded the best chance of testing this method and find some old coins. It just turned out I didn't find that much. The best equipment combined with the best site and good operator skills still only offer the best POTENTIAL to find good coins...there are no guarantees.

I bought 6 hours of pleasure metal detecting for my money. I don't measure the results of my finds with a cost analysis of find value versus cost. If I did, I'd sell my detector tomorrow. I'm buying hope, anticipation, and the excitement of the find. Ask a sport fisherman how much per pound his catch is after he buys a boat, motor, gas for that, and for the car to get to the lake or river...fishing poles, lures, food to take, fishing licenses. etc. etc. He'll still go fishing if he loves it. It's not about the fish!

Usually I travel with a hunting buddy or two and we split the cost of the gasoline. But I wouldn't put my detector on the shelf because of the cost of going to a good site. It would be like buying a car and then not driving it because gas was too high, or living in the dark because of the high cost of electricity. Adjusted for inflation, the cost of gas is not that much higher than it was here in the '80's.

Don't get me wrong, I think we're getting gouged here too! Excessive taxes, and artificial shortages engineered by the oil companies. When you control the supply, demand doesn't mean all that much. If we cut back, they'll find some stupid reason to shut down a refinery and there will be less gas at higher prices.

Life is short...if it costs me a few more bucks to go metal detecting and that gives me pleasure, I'll find a way to make it happen.

Taxes too high? I remember an old slogan from History class we chanted in the late 1700's..."no taxation without representation!" All you can do is throw (vote) the bastards out and hope the next guy didn't lie as much to get into office!

Knipper
 
Knipper i agree with you 100% about the pleasure from detecting been the number 1 consideration, i too have in the past travelled quite far to detect. The thing with me is though i like to spend a few days working a site so travelling too and fro from a site say 80 miles away is not practical always. I am (hopefully) going to buy a cheap camper van sometime to aid me on this score.. Locally i have worked out alot of sites i used to like doing , i have to find new sites locally i know but i have had no luck finding any new sites worth re -working locally.
I have tried a few new sites fairly locally but as yet the sites have been bad. I have put detecting on a back burner for the time being.. More time i spend reading these forums than i should i know, i guess i should be out doing some detecting in place of been on the forums. I admit i am in a rut with it ..
 
After digging 17 million targets you will start to see patterns on how the target icon(or numbers) bounce, and this is what you typically use to make a dig/don't dig decision on the iffies.

Chris
 
Top