Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

FYI Something I noticed about the New Explorer SE

Id like to ask a few questions if I may. Sounds like you learned alot about the SE and would be honest in your response.

#1 So did you use the pitch hold for most of your hunting?
#2 Was the new Se not losing any targets in disturbed dirt while just in Pitch Hold or with any setting such as running in normal?

Thanks again for your great info!

Bart
 
HEY JERRY....DON'T YOU DARE :nono: BACK OFF TELLING US ALL WHAT YOU DISCOVER! I am a "good ole boy" and a "dealer", and it is good to hear what you have to say about your discoveries!!!!:clapping::jump:

It's about time we started to look at the SE "as a new machine" and go from there. Every thing I have had to say has been "pooh-poohed" as having come from a "dealer", and obviously "shaded as such". Of course my 30 years experience detecting hasn't meant much either....:rofl:

Right on my friend......:cheers:
 
Hello Brad.......thank goodness :jump: for another sane and intelligent voice heard from. I applaud :clapping: your post, and have to say that you are 100% on with the content.

Looking forward to many more of your posts. :cheers:
 
I voiced my concerns about what appeared to be the relatively modest enhancements included in the SE over the XS line last week, and I have taken quite a bit of flack on this forum for my opinion. That's OK, it doesn't really bother me, but I would like to address your list:

1. Subjectivity around detector opinions in general for mine to matter.

I once owned a Garrett 2500, but shelved it for a Minelab XS and have been a great advocate of Minelab and the XS since I bought mine shortly after it was released. What I am trying to say is that I only like Minelab detectors - so were on the same page and in a way I am preaching to the choir, which is OK with me.

2. So many different skill levels out there that a published opinion might only make sense or be potentially useful to a relative few.

I'm not an old time detectorist from the 70's, but I've had my XS for a long time and have gotten to know it quite well. I think I'm pretty good with it and would love to get together with someone that considers themselves an ace to see if in fact they can find items that I can't with it. I'm in northern NJ so if you'd like to get together for a friendly hunt drop me a line and I'll even buy lunch!

3. "Fox and Grape" cases where a person for whatever the reason can't easily justify the expenditure, so they whack relentlessly on the detector.

The cost of the detector is not an issue for me - in fact I bought my SE last week on a whim.

4. Another variation of #3 is the person winds up buying the detector but regrets spending the money so they really go through the learning
experience sporting an attitude that insures failure. Failure looking like "It wasn't worth it". In other words, don't look to this person for the most in objectivity.

This statement doesn't really make sense, because if they overspent on something like a car they would take even better care of it and learn all the ins and outs rather than neglect it and run it into the ground. Since the $1100 was of no real consequence to me I don't regret the purchase and welcome having a third Minelab machine at my disposal - especially if it has even nominal improvements over the XS - how can you lose?

5. Last but not least, one of the downsides to the internet and all it's information, it's used waaaaaaaaaaayy too much as a crutch by a lot of folks to not have to go through the normal "old school" learning process of "on the job training". It's like people that will buy a video game and then look up on the internet to find all the "cheat" info. This is sorta like information "welfare" and I think most would agree that one of the biggest downsides to any free entitlement is that the longer one is "on" it the less likely that they will do what it takes on their own. What is wrong with the concept of, if you're interested and can afford what you're interested in, buy the da&n thing and learn it at your pace in your world!? Won't that be a more overall rewarding experience than going from street clothes to internet trained "black belt" in two weeks? And if you can't afford it, accept it gracefully and RELAX.

You're assuming that the SE has all sorts of hidden features over the XS series which the manufacturer certainly would not hide, but shout at us from the mountain top. The spec sheet has no references at all to mysterious new features that are there for us to eventually discover using the "old school" approach. The engineers would not have hidden things in the hardware (as a software designer might do in a video game) and I'm sure there are no mysterious features in the machine that could only be explained by divine intervention or came about spontaneously. Every aspect of a metal detector is quantifiable.

6. The manufacturers and dealers love for the early buy individuals to go out and talk all the good news to hopefully impact sales positively, but those same early buyers are the ones that usually catch all the sh*t from those mentioned above so after awhile, who wants to be the front man?. Not me. That's one of those "hard to justify" things too.

This point almost addresses my biggest issue with this forum right now and that it that it appears that the biggest cheerleaders for the SE are the dealers themselves (and perhaps certain individuals that potentially stand to gain discounts) - what a surprise! Is anyone surprised that some those that have the most to gain from touting the wonders of the new machine seem to be the most vocal and conversely the most defensive when someone posts an opinion that is contrary to increasing sales. Ocean7 got angry last week about this and I think his post was removed for some reason - this is after all a USER forum, but as of late it seems to have become more of a sales forum thanks to the obvious spindoctoring going on around here. Regardless, I bought the SE and I am happy to have it, though I would be a lot happier if Minelab had focused all of their resources on depth and speed.

To those users that sincerely like the new machine and have nothing to gain by saying that - I hope to be able to learn something from you that I have so far missed. I won't be putting my SE up for sale - it is a better XS - and I'll continue logging time with it. I respect your opinions and I read your posts with interest.

I know this post will draw flames from some, but I think it had to be said (and I think others were thinking it) and I'm not going to be cowed into voicing my opinion by indirect references to other posts, contrary to mine, as being the only "sane" or only "posts that make sense" on this board.

Anyone who wants to get together and test these theories out in the field doing some real metal detecting, I welcome it, and hope to learn something from it.
 
Hello Erik....thank you for your inputs. Your knowledge of the Minelab XS is obvious, while your apparent soured opinion of us dealers, speaks for itself. I can't speak for the others. however, as for this "spin doctor" all I can say is that I am an avid detectorist first, with over 25 years experience swinging most brands of detector, and a dealer second.

What mysterious power do you have that affords you the ability to determine whether I truly believe what I have said about the SE, or that I am just spinnning for sales? What makes your observations about me or other dealers automatically correct? And most importantly how can you expound on what I think or what my motives are when you do not know me or have not met me?

I'm not really looking for an answer from you, rather just expounding my final words on the matter. Like a favorite TV personality of mine, I will just say "the spin stops here", and so does my input to this thread.
 
Erik, you are trying to use logic and reason. Think "MYTH" grasshopper..............and chant softly as you see that deep coin rising to meet the detection field of the coil. Focus.... Little One.... and the date on the coin will come to your mind locked in with amazing clarity.

Have you never understood dousing, Spanish dip needles, forked peach limbs, it is like the fish that got away, the deer the size of a bull elephant, the full moon and cool night air and sound of hounds chasing a raccoon, peeing in a carbide lamp.

Now take that away and what have we got? We enjoy doing what would be considered cruel and unusual punishment if made to spend our hard earned money time after time to find a pulltab, tinfoil, scraps of aluminum, but wow I found a silver dime and it must be worth a dollar.

By the way can a guy sue a detector manufacture for shoulder cup replacement?
 
Ron, You are right I've lost targets with my EII after digging the ground up. It never dawned on me this is a problem with the EII.
I'am ordering my SE tomorrow. Which i was going to do anyway.
Thanks for the post.
 
Thank you Ron for the reply - I appreciate it. I always use the X-1 probe so I've never really had the problem of losing targets with the XS. It'd be interesting to find out how they did it. Regards, Erik
 
Ron, thanks for the great deal on the SE with both coils. I guess this makes a dozen machines I have purchased from you and one reason is you always conduct yourself like a real professional. I don't recall anyone going out of their way as you have to give service after the sale. You are a real credit to our hobby and as a Minelab representative.

Thanks again and I look forward to the new SE. Have a good one bud.
 
I have been burned too many times by the Explorer when I thought an observation I made in the field was reliable only to later discover it was not.

Has someone actually swung an EX II over the same hole to confirm the SE gets a signal and the EX II does not? Until that is confirmed in the field I think the jury is still out on this one.

If this is confirmed then all bets are off on the SE. That means ML has tinkered with the inner workings of the machine in a serious way and we may yet discover all kinds of interesting new things.

That said change is not always for the better. For all we know they may have sacrificed something else in order to eliminate the problem of losing the signal once a hole has been dug.

That seems to often be the case with these gadgets. Its a balancing act. Both previous Explorers hated air space between the coil and the target. They didn't much like disturbed soil either. Maybe there was a good reason for that.

The optimistic view would be that they improved this issue without sacrificing performance elsewhere. Only a fair amount of side by side comparisons in the field will flush that out.

I am anxious to buy an SE but it would prove too tempting a distraction right now as I'm trying to finish the remodel on my house. Pretty soon though I'll be swinging one of these!

Charles
 
I myself am not until now an Explorer User. What I remembered when I did use an EXP2 was the way the target seemed to disappear. I did not post what I found right off the bat Because in the past it did not matter what myself as a Dealer observed but what someone that is Not a Dealer that mattered. I called Jerry so he could verify what I had noticed and it was the same. I have nothing to gain by telling anyone something that is not right as this is What I do for a living. (No Full Time Job) like a Lot of other Part Time Dealers have. HH, Ron
 
I have never lost a signal once the hole has been opened. I guess that may be that i always check it with the x-1 probe. I can not say that it does not happen, just not to me. It may be rust or some other garbage but the sunray probe comes through every time.
 
Ron I know several ML dealers, all of them great guys and NONE of them blow smoke to make a sale. If anything I think they talk a number of customers out of a sale bending over backwards to offer an honest opinion of value when comparing one detector to another. In other words folks being a dealer doesn't make the person a bad guy.

Are there some dealers out there who blow smoke? Yep! But its been my experience that they don't hang around Findmall. Too dangerous, the folks here are too savvy when it comes to their equipment.

That said my interest here is completely technical. I'm not questioning the finding, I'm simply saying its very interesting and potentially quite significant so lets raise the bar in terms of the integrity of the test and actually swing an Explorer II over one of these holes and confirm the Explorer II can't get a single while the Explorer SE can.

Charles
 
Top