woodchiphustler
New member
Want to go head to head with the new LTD2. Stand by.
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Mike Hillis said:Geo,
Do you think they'll compliment each other, or compete with each other?
HH
Mike
woodchiphustler said:Since all my tests are live digs on hard hit sites we will see. I know I will not compare boost process, that would be unfair so I will compare Fast on both, use default on F75. I only hunt relics on ground that is iron enriched. If the F19 works for me someone will be getting a like new LTD2 at a fair price.![]()
steve herschbach said:I will Steve. Hope to have the F19 on Saturday. Congrats on your retirement.
Hey George,
Very curious to hear what you think. I was a big F75 fan but let it go in favor of the Gold Bug Pro due to EMI issues. My main complaint with Gold Bug Pro is lack of volume options. I have a new F75 on the way after having run a prototype and am selling the Gold Bug Pro in favor of it, but it got me to wondering about the F19 also. I do like the ability to adjust the tone break which is inexplicably lacking on the F75. The F75 on the other hand I prefer to swing because even though it is heavier the balance is superb. Best handling detector I have ever used. The F19 I would expect that even with improvements to F75 would be more EMI resistant than the new F75. The F75 does have that magic Boost process. Back and forth I go.
I do think not using Boost is not giving the full picture however, and hope you will give it a go and report there also.
Why does First Texas just not make a 19 kHz EMI resistant F75 with a tone break and Boost process? They have all the ingredients but key features spread out over two machines.
Thanks in advance and Happy Thanksgiving!
steve herschbach said:The Gold Bug/G2/F19 is one of the most EMI resistant detectors you can get, the old F75 one of the worst. Go figure.
woodchiphustler said:Mike Hillis said:Geo,
Do you think they'll compliment each other, or compete with each other?
HH
Mike
Mike I'am a one trick pony.
foreign object said:woodchiphustler said:Mike Hillis said:Geo,
Do you think they'll compliment each other, or compete with each other?
HH
Mike
Mike I'am a one trick pony.
steve herschbach said:Hey George,
Very curious to hear what you think. I was a big F75 fan but let it go in favor of the Gold Bug Pro due to EMI issues. My main complaint with Gold Bug Pro is lack of volume options. I have a new F75 on the way after having run a prototype and am selling the Gold Bug Pro in favor of it, but it got me to wondering about the F19 also. I do like the ability to adjust the tone break which is inexplicably lacking on the F75. The F75 on the other hand I prefer to swing because even though it is heavier the balance is superb. Best handling detector I have ever used. The F19 I would expect that even with improvements to F75 would be more EMI resistant than the new F75. The F75 does have that magic Boost process. Back and forth I go.
I do think not using Boost is not giving the full picture however, and hope you will give it a go and report there also. Steve have no worry the 19 cannot compete with boost process depth.You would need a larger coil.
Why does First Texas just not make a 19 kHz EMI resistant F75 with a tone break and Boost process? They have all the ingredients but key features spread out over two machines.
Thanks in advance and Happy Thanksgiving!