Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

How does the CS-7 PI....

A

Anonymous

Guest
compare to the Aquastar and the Goldquest SS?
Thanks
HH
Beachcomber
 
The CS-7 will get around 45% less depth then the Aquastar on a nickel. However by varying the Frequency control on the CS-7. You can tell if the target may be a gold ring. I have not used the Goldquest SS. I have 6 underwater machines now. But the new coming Garrett PI sure looks good so far.
Terry in Hawaii
 
There is a very noticeable sensitivity, and depth difference between the Aquastar, and the CS7. There really not in the same category. The Aquastar is a very high powered PI detector running at 10uS. minimum pulse delay.
The connection between the Goldquest SS , and the CS7 would be more in order, though there not close to each other performance wise. The CS7 was designed by Eric Foster for CScope. The Goldquest SS is Eric
 
first ive heard of that mr bill whats that about the probe ????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top