A
Anonymous
Guest
this is where we as a nation has come to...starving an innocent woman to death, WHICH YOU CAN'T LEGALLY DO TO A DOG, because of hearsay testimony and refusing multiple testimonies that the husband was unfit to be a gaurdian,evidence that kept pointing to abuse and possible attempts on her life even when incapacitated, the other two branches of government not taking the country back and allowing the judiciary to become an oligarchy. "We the people" have no redress of our government as "the foxes are gaurding the hen house". When the news was announced at work one the co-workers shouting "I'm glad it's overwith, it was just a bunch of political BS from the beginning."
Nazi Germany began their eugenics movement with the starvation of a severly handicapped child. Having seen the slippery slope that started with the Roe v. Wade decision don't expect this one to reverse as it will expand. Shortly you will hear of other deaths and quality of life issues.
I have a scenario for you to decide upon whether someone should live or die. Don't post your answer as this is just an exersize.
This person has a disease where little is known as to it's cause. The aftermath of the disease is well known because it is almost epidemic in proportions to the amount of people contracting it. The person is so affected by the disease that they can only move their eyes. they can't communicate but they are not brain dead. It's coming close to the point that they may need asisstance to breathe. What should the family do? This was a true situation. If you thought that they should live, I can tell you that it had a happy ending. If you thought that the person should not be allowed to lived then you just killed .........ME. The disease was polio and I did make a partial recovery, physically. I married and had three children. I work and pay taxes.
Shouldn't we as Christians be the voice for the voiceless, the fatherless and the widows?
Hug your family and appreciate every momentyou have with them.
Thanks for letting me vent.
Nazi Germany began their eugenics movement with the starvation of a severly handicapped child. Having seen the slippery slope that started with the Roe v. Wade decision don't expect this one to reverse as it will expand. Shortly you will hear of other deaths and quality of life issues.
I have a scenario for you to decide upon whether someone should live or die. Don't post your answer as this is just an exersize.
This person has a disease where little is known as to it's cause. The aftermath of the disease is well known because it is almost epidemic in proportions to the amount of people contracting it. The person is so affected by the disease that they can only move their eyes. they can't communicate but they are not brain dead. It's coming close to the point that they may need asisstance to breathe. What should the family do? This was a true situation. If you thought that they should live, I can tell you that it had a happy ending. If you thought that the person should not be allowed to lived then you just killed .........ME. The disease was polio and I did make a partial recovery, physically. I married and had three children. I work and pay taxes.
Shouldn't we as Christians be the voice for the voiceless, the fatherless and the widows?
Hug your family and appreciate every momentyou have with them.
Thanks for letting me vent.