Hello all...
Im sure this will be heard and hopefully copied and posted in reply to the certain gentleman concerned.
A certain video and post was brought to my attention by a few now so feel I must answer in a way that don’t offend anyone or a sole company.
First of all it looks like you’re on a crusade Calabash to bring down a company for no apparent reason.
I can find faults with most machines on the market and no manufacturers have made the gains I’ve wanted to see in 2019 considering their countless amounts of cash and resources.
It’s very hard to make gains in detecting especially when funds and resources are limited, but for the biggest players on the market all they’re doing is making small improvements and making the machines looks nicer, personally I don’t wear metal detectors like jewellery so don’t really care what the machine looks like, my main focus is performance of a machine and how user friendly it is.
So when you look at let’s say the biggest three metal detecting companies in the world, countless amounts of cash to throw into detector design and technology but only to come up with machines that hardly if anything performs a little better than their previous models.
I feel you need to think hard why you’re throwing stones at a small family run detector company in Europe ??
I’m not getting the violins out for DeepTech but if you knew the facts and figures that these big companies have compared to us I think it might register with you why and where we are in the market at the moment.
We have a great reputation in analog technology, Plamen Rashkov is highly known in the detecting world for his great work and what’s he’s achieved with analog machines.
We have a loyal customer base and produce simple straight forward machines that can offer just as much performance in some cases as the big hitters out there without all the bells and whistles, in many cases for a lot less cash, just because our technology you may feel is dated but isn’t the case really and that our design is not to your taste is your words justified?
when you look at performance gains with analog and digital detectors where is the huge performance gap ?
Was only a few years back that our Vista Warrior in the hands of a well respected individual was the only machine to hit a settled buried hoard... outdated technology you say ??
Our new Vista X we a proud of, it has many new firsts for us with a dual extended discrimination circuit and new design features, this opens up new opportunities that was never an option for our customers before, so to see what I see as an online bully trying to kick a company that have limited resources is sad really, I don’t know why you feel the need to attack us, not once have we or anyone said that our machines are the best on the market or made claims that it will make all other machines obsolete like other companies have!
If we had the cash and resources of these big companies I can tell you now that we would be producing very futuristic machines as we have ambitions and the knowledge to do so.
But for now we try and give the customer new features and be relevant in a very brutal detecting market full of wolves and restrictions with limited cash.
So you must have something against a small family business that is doing what we can when we can to progress and give people the best we can at this point in time.
Please in the future bare this in mind and take a look at what metal gains have been made by these leading companies with endless amounts of cash compared to a small limited family run detector business has done before you talk bad of us and post videos online.
Has their huge amounts of cash and resources made our machines obsolete? Is their digital performance gains massive over our analog machines... I think not!
So what we talking here mm in separation gains ? centimetres in depth depending on soil minerals ?
I’ve personally been out with detectorist and gone over signals and compared many targets and seen the surprise on their faces when they hear the audio compared to their expensive machines, but when you get companies that have advertising budgets that we could only dream of your words have been answered when you ask where are the folks using DeepTech machines.
Should you be happy that these big companies have made hardly any real decent gains if any in some cases over a small European manufacturer that in their own country the laws and red tape makes detecting illegal and hard to move forward as we would like let alone get certain parts shipped on and exported from Bulgaria.
Please next time think before you jump as on the scale of things the high end companies haven’t moved that far forward than us, they just put lipstick on their machines and have the resources and cash to advertise them in every corner of the globe with many employees to shout about them, but we send out a few test machines and then hear your words is sad really.
Many thanks
Aaron
DeepTech Metal Detectors.
Im sure this will be heard and hopefully copied and posted in reply to the certain gentleman concerned.
A certain video and post was brought to my attention by a few now so feel I must answer in a way that don’t offend anyone or a sole company.
First of all it looks like you’re on a crusade Calabash to bring down a company for no apparent reason.
I can find faults with most machines on the market and no manufacturers have made the gains I’ve wanted to see in 2019 considering their countless amounts of cash and resources.
It’s very hard to make gains in detecting especially when funds and resources are limited, but for the biggest players on the market all they’re doing is making small improvements and making the machines looks nicer, personally I don’t wear metal detectors like jewellery so don’t really care what the machine looks like, my main focus is performance of a machine and how user friendly it is.
So when you look at let’s say the biggest three metal detecting companies in the world, countless amounts of cash to throw into detector design and technology but only to come up with machines that hardly if anything performs a little better than their previous models.
I feel you need to think hard why you’re throwing stones at a small family run detector company in Europe ??
I’m not getting the violins out for DeepTech but if you knew the facts and figures that these big companies have compared to us I think it might register with you why and where we are in the market at the moment.
We have a great reputation in analog technology, Plamen Rashkov is highly known in the detecting world for his great work and what’s he’s achieved with analog machines.
We have a loyal customer base and produce simple straight forward machines that can offer just as much performance in some cases as the big hitters out there without all the bells and whistles, in many cases for a lot less cash, just because our technology you may feel is dated but isn’t the case really and that our design is not to your taste is your words justified?
when you look at performance gains with analog and digital detectors where is the huge performance gap ?
Was only a few years back that our Vista Warrior in the hands of a well respected individual was the only machine to hit a settled buried hoard... outdated technology you say ??
Our new Vista X we a proud of, it has many new firsts for us with a dual extended discrimination circuit and new design features, this opens up new opportunities that was never an option for our customers before, so to see what I see as an online bully trying to kick a company that have limited resources is sad really, I don’t know why you feel the need to attack us, not once have we or anyone said that our machines are the best on the market or made claims that it will make all other machines obsolete like other companies have!
If we had the cash and resources of these big companies I can tell you now that we would be producing very futuristic machines as we have ambitions and the knowledge to do so.
But for now we try and give the customer new features and be relevant in a very brutal detecting market full of wolves and restrictions with limited cash.
So you must have something against a small family business that is doing what we can when we can to progress and give people the best we can at this point in time.
Please in the future bare this in mind and take a look at what metal gains have been made by these leading companies with endless amounts of cash compared to a small limited family run detector business has done before you talk bad of us and post videos online.
Has their huge amounts of cash and resources made our machines obsolete? Is their digital performance gains massive over our analog machines... I think not!
So what we talking here mm in separation gains ? centimetres in depth depending on soil minerals ?
I’ve personally been out with detectorist and gone over signals and compared many targets and seen the surprise on their faces when they hear the audio compared to their expensive machines, but when you get companies that have advertising budgets that we could only dream of your words have been answered when you ask where are the folks using DeepTech machines.
Should you be happy that these big companies have made hardly any real decent gains if any in some cases over a small European manufacturer that in their own country the laws and red tape makes detecting illegal and hard to move forward as we would like let alone get certain parts shipped on and exported from Bulgaria.
Please next time think before you jump as on the scale of things the high end companies haven’t moved that far forward than us, they just put lipstick on their machines and have the resources and cash to advertise them in every corner of the globe with many employees to shout about them, but we send out a few test machines and then hear your words is sad really.
Many thanks
Aaron
DeepTech Metal Detectors.
