A
Anonymous
Guest
JC,
Thankyou. I'm sorry, but I disagree. In 5,506,506 Candy illustrates the ferrous responses decay far slower than non-ferrous. (F1(c) Candy's efforts to deal to ground mineralisation are met [in 5,576,624] by the last samplings - the L and LB periods - which I hav'nt mentioned before.
My belief - as far as 5,576,624 goes, Candy doesn't digitise at all. Granted, in 5550,650,6 Candy does utilise a "look-up" function, but (and I sincerely ask - does he or doesn't he, subsequently?) I believe the SD 2100 to be completely analogue.
Surely JC, long pulses use power.
g.
Thankyou. I'm sorry, but I disagree. In 5,506,506 Candy illustrates the ferrous responses decay far slower than non-ferrous. (F1(c) Candy's efforts to deal to ground mineralisation are met [in 5,576,624] by the last samplings - the L and LB periods - which I hav'nt mentioned before.
My belief - as far as 5,576,624 goes, Candy doesn't digitise at all. Granted, in 5550,650,6 Candy does utilise a "look-up" function, but (and I sincerely ask - does he or doesn't he, subsequently?) I believe the SD 2100 to be completely analogue.
Surely JC, long pulses use power.
g.