Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Might Seem Obvious...

C

CladDog

New member
But has anyone noticied a sensitivity advantage in favor of the AT Gold over the AT Pro for smaller jewelry?
 
I've never used the At/Gold, but if it's anymore sensitive than the At/Pro on smaller jewelry, I sure need to win one this year during the 50th anniversary find of the month contest. Of course, that would require me to get up and go do some dirt fishing.
 
If you are refering to the true all metal mode on the AT Gold, vs. zero disc. on the AT Pro the answer is yes! And at depth vs. depth, coil size the same, the true all metal mode on the Gold will give you about 1" better depth on the same coin sized object, in the same soil.
 
Thanks John.

I guess my real question should be put this way:

Are there gold jewelry targets that the AT Gold will hit that the AT Pro will not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top