Beachcomber
New member
Ground Mineralization varies a great deal from one area to another and choice of detectors definitely depends on what works in your area. I have hunted many times in North Eastern and Central Eastern Virgina with machines that weren't designed for heavy mineralization and they worked well. But there have been some places that I have hunted where these same machines were all but useless. The machine you mentioned the Whites XLT is a 4 filter machine that was designed to be able to hevier mineraliztion than most machines so I am not surprised that you have found few machines that are it's equal in your area. Here in NJ where I live the Explorer will easily leave it in the dust. I have used an Xterra here and it has worked well too. I am surprised that you say the Explorer doesn't work well in your area as it to was designed to be able to handle mineralization. There is one quirk for land hunting with the Explorer where a good signle frequency machine will be able to surpass it and this maybe the type of areas that you are hunting. That is plowed farm fields! For the Explorer's Ground Compensating circuitry to work best it needs relatively packed or undistrubed ground. It does not like ground with a lot of air or air spaces in it. I have huted several plowed farm fields where I was only getting half the depth I was acustomed to with the Explorer. I rehunted those same fields using a top of the line single frequency detector and found old coins, buttons, and bullets that gave much stronger singals and at much more depth than I was getting on my Explorer. But this is the only situtation that I have found this to be true. For the msot part the Explorer has worked well wherever I ahve taken it though I have heard there are some areas in Virginia that have some very heavy mineralization that maybe just too much for it. However areas that I have hunted there didn't pose any problems. Those old 4 filter Whites where good machines!
HH
Beachcomber
HH
Beachcomber