Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

More Etrac Mush

Jim upstate NY

New member
I went to one of my pounded sites this morning, hunted for 4 hours in the solid nails and iron.. here is the mush..
You can not hunt in relic mode in conductive..
you can not hunt in relic mode in ferrous with 4 tones or 2 tones
reason for above you will hear high tone falsing all over the place, I dont think I could get used to it if I used it a year.

I would think in some of the iron infested fields in england they would be seeing this also.. unless they are strictly using other patterns with more iron notched out?

I should have tried a coin pattern on the few signals I did get, just to see if that much disc would mask the response from those targets

you can however and this is the strangest thing to me and maybe its in the manual but I dont remember reading it
you can set the tones to multi in relic mode and ferrous.. this will stop the high tone falses, however it seems you only get a low tone on iron and a very slightly higher tone on everything else? maybe its the same as one tone, but when I set it to one tone it seemed everything read the same

running in relic mode, ferrous, high trash and difficult ground in multi "two"tone mode

sens at 20 manual.. quite a bit of nulling, with pops and crackles. got a piece of rusty tin and a small piece of lead

Auto sens quiets it down and not as much solid nulling, however I think it really lowers the sens down quite a bit, all I could manage was a couple pieces of small foil on top of the ground and a couple small caliber bullet casings less than an inch deep.
I tried burying a dime at 6 inches in the crap, and auto would not peep, manual would high tone/low tone, but I think enough to make you check it out.. at least in a site you pounded pretty good..

I did dig two small bent square nails, that actually read solid high tone, same as the other non ferrous stuff I dug.. dont remember where they were reading on the screen as I just dug them with the good tone they were giving..
I also don't know where the cutoff was from low to high in the multi "two" tone mode is on the ferrous scale

Haven't found much of anything with the explorer at this site last couple times either, but was hoping the "faster" processor would get a few things, I know its there...

Other findings, it definitely hits on hot rocks, not with such a squelch the explorer does, but more like an in and out high tone..
the readings were always 1 ferrous and jumped around from 30-46 in conductive.. each one would hit with a different conductive reading, come and go across the top of the screen.. but because they don't come in solid, they make you stop and check them out closely.... explorer hot rock hit was always high top right and a high washed out tone.. easy to tell

was having a hard time seeing the screen in the woods, was overcast and not very bright in there, I did put on the minelab rain cover and it fits.. maybe that was affecting being able to see as well.. problem with this is if you do get that higher tone it can be difficult to get an exact reading off the meter.. one of the reasons I liked ferrous mode wide open on the explorer in spots like this.. just by by tone alone

I think I will try and modify the relic screen a bit more to knock out some more of the iron and hope it doesn't mask anything, the way it looked most of those hits were coming in the bottom right part of the screen, hopefully far enough away from the 12 line it wont knock out much

More mush to follow as I use it at some more pounded sites, wanted to stop at my old park I got the three silver dimes at last time with the explorer on the way back home to try park mode and conductive, but they had some fall festival going on and a million people were there.. if the rain holds off maybe I will try another spot before dark..


I know I havent posted much here in a while, and it may seem like I only came over to find faults, but I was pretty excited seeing the iron video as much as anyone hoping for a better machine in iron, which was what cinched me buying one and this is the place where the users are, but
If my posts really do seem like mush to you guys, and don't want me to report my thoughts and findings on the Etrac, just let me know.. I can make my own decision on whether I keep it or not, but thought maybe someone would want to hear how I am making out, and maybe someone else hunting the same types of areas can compare what I am seeing.. I suppose it could be my ground here, as its not all that good.. But I gotta think more people than me hunt old cellar holes loaded with iron. I am also quite in tune with the explorer so there's not much to think about while using it.. maybe this machine has just too many options and you might start doubting your settings or pattern you should be using as well, but I do know I can not handle 5 or 6 high tone falses per swing and try to concentrate on good ones... time will tell I guess


Now the Etrac I am sure will be a fine machine, and perhaps much easier for beginners with all its modes and settings, I cant say..
And I am not trying to knock it, I am trying to figure out the reasons for the changes and what it might do better than the explorer, but the price is not set for beginners in my opinion its for those that consider themselves experienced and are looking for something better than they have. I think had they added all the features and advancements while preserving the true ferrous readings and audio, it would be a cut above the explorer.. I know I know its not an explorer, but its close enough they could surely have kept one mode for us explorer users.. and it still would be the same for those that dont want to hunt in relic mode, which I think the majority will be unable to do anyway

I guess that's why I dont get asked to field test anything anymore, they might not want the truth as I see it.
 
I went out this morning for an hour and dug 4 signals that were 10 inches or more in rocky soil, three were gold colored screw caps and the forth was a white screw cap. I was trying out the 12.5 excelerator, it sure makes them caps sound good, the last 4 times I been at this river park no more coins have been found. I have been thinking about ordering the Pro coil for my E2 or just buy a SE with the Pro coil, so I better get out there and dig some more aluminum to pay for it.
 
Jim, I respect your posts and all this information is useful whether it is positive or negative about the detector. I take some of the comments by all with a grain of salt, one thing I could care less about is "ability to cover more area due to faster recovery". If people want that and like that, they should go back to Whites................................................I sure am in no hurry, it is my hobby and I enjoy detecting at my slower speed, besides, I would like to see half the people here try and go fast in the thick underbrush, fallen log cover areas I hunt. I think they would be snapping off lower rod ends weekly.

I'm all for improvements but as been stated, the 2D SmartScreen to me is what the Explorer was all about, never was big on digital, especially being a woods homestead hunter. So, I keep pluggin on with my original XS, but I guess now since I got the Pro Coil on it, maybe I should redesginate it my XS Pro! :)

Don
 
"ability to cover more area due to faster recovery"


I believe the advantage here is better target separation. Getting good targets closer to junk.

HH

Frank
 
All I can say is that I've seen the same results as Jim. This machine falses all over the screen. Thank you Jim and Digitrich for speaking the facts!! I remember the post a year or so back about: how many of you wanted to wrap their Explorer around a tree. Hopefully we can find the settings that make this machine live up to the MUSH. Thanks EddieB
 
I enjoyed reading your post. I read em all and they sit in the brain until needed or until they make sense. Thanks...Jim
 
having a lot of difficulty with the E-Trac. It's not helping me feel to confident about my decision to buy one. I should have mine by mid-week. I spend the morning at my local Minelab Dealer testing the E-Trac with different gold rings. Like you have been a Ferrous Mode hunter almost since the Explorer came out so having lost the Ferrous Mode is a major disappointment to me and well as cramming all the targets so close together on one line that there is no longer any target separation like we had on the Explorer. If that wasn't discouraging enough when testing the gold rings the majority of the Women's rings and Diamond rings now read in the tinfoil area at the far left side of the screen with readings of between 12-1 and 12-4 so it will take digging a lot more junk to get a gold ring with the E-Tac than with the Explorer. So with all these drawbacks you are probably wondering why I still decided to buy one. Well it was for the other features and also because there seems to be a major depth increase in the E-trac over the Explorer but that will need to be proven more in the field. Oh one thing we did find in testing taht was when targets are out at the fringe area of detection and they start to give kind of a crappy audio response to where you are not sure if ti is a good signal or not...at that point actually speeding up your sweep over the target will clean up the signal if it's a good target. Any way I should have more to report in a week once i have the machine and have had more time on the beach with it. I figure worst case scenario is that I can't get used to not having the Ferrous Mode or I get to aggravated at having to dig tons of tinfoil to get a gold ring and at that point I just end up selling it and sticking with my Explorer and lamenting the loss of the other kewl features and increased depth of the E-Trac :) Nothing is ever easy :)

Good Luck with your E-Trac!!!!

HH

Beachcomber
 
Jim upstate NY said:
Now the Etrac I am sure will be a fine machine, and perhaps much easier for beginners with all its modes and settings, I cant say..
And I am not trying to knock it, I am trying to figure out the reasons for the changes and what it might do better than the explorer, but the price is not set for beginners in my opinion its for those that consider themselves experienced and are looking for something better than they have. I think had they added all the features and advancements while preserving the true ferrous readings and audio, it would be a cut above the explorer.. I know I know its not an explorer, but its close enough they could surely have kept one mode for us explorer users.. and it still would be the same for those that dont want to hunt in relic mode, which I think the majority will be unable to do anyway

I guess that's why I don't get asked to field test anything anymore, they might not want the truth as I see it.

They used to ask you to field test stuff? Well if that is the case and you speak your mind and the truth your days were numbered unfortunately.

Keep posting your opinions and such. I don't care if their seem negative or positive. I agree with you in your quote that I embolden. Especially your last statement. It would've been so simple just to have a SE FE mode with a push of a button. ML in my opinion should have NEVER changed the FE settings. They should have left it like it was with the expanded spectrum and everything would've been peachy. But Nooooo, some engineer on his 11th coffee said hey,"I got a great concept" and never thought about how it would affect people, those who hunt for relics and such people like me who like using FE more than cond. As we all can see it has created a backlash of negative PR and to me makes no sense at all. I'll never buy an E-TRAC, no way, no how because of the FE issue! People who are not on here and not alerted to this fact are going to get peepeed off when they see this too. You have all these new features, some useful and you take a basic component like FE out. "A fly in the ointment ..." That issue will keep biting them in their backsides for years to come and will hinder sales if people know about this beforehand. If it is not a big issue and it is a strong point then have ML put it in their ads for the E-TRAC. "Revolutionary Technology" "blah,blah,blah" AND "Most things are clumped together in FE as 12" "Not recommended for relic hunting" Will that help sales or hurt it? What is it? First thing that comes to mind! I think you honestly know the answer in the first thing that comes to your mind.


The ironic thing is that they taunted the expanded spectrum of Conduc and FE but then they are basically squeezing most things together as FE 12 and then the kicker is that this basic feature of a MD that they have raped they do not even mention it in the manual but they post it on their website as a FAQ! :rolleyes:
 
Just remember that it is NOT an Explorer, don't try to make it be one and you'll like it.

I like mine a lot.

Julien
 
It would've been so simple just to have a SE FE mode with a push of a button.

You don't know that.

With the new software, the way they set the breakpoints, and set up conductive readings, it may not have been a workable idea to have it be able to switch to a whole different ferrous readout.

J
 
Ditto on the lack of results and we just got 4 1/2 inches of rain. I am getting pretty bumbed out.:surrender::thumbdown: Maybe we just got two crappy machines cause mine is not getting depth for nothing either, unless it's some really large piece of junk, which I can't tell the size or depth of by sound, even when I turn down the gain. And am I tripping, or do you also get high tones barely audible in your nulls that change tones like pitch hold, but in the nulls themselves???
 
jbow said:
It would've been so simple just to have a SE FE mode with a push of a button.

You don't know that.

With the new software, the way they set the breakpoints, and set up conductive readings, it may not have been a workable idea to have it be able to switch to a whole different ferrous readout.

J

What was so hard about coding most things as FE 12? They should have just left it alone. Besides the basics of metal detecting has not changed in 20-25 years. It's mostly software in this new version except the faster processor and modifications of PCB. All they had to do was code it in and that whole different ferrous readout you mention is the TRUE indication not FE=12!
 
then I hear in audio, no matter what audio setting it is.. Makes me feel like I hear the computer working in there :) just barely audible but I can hear it.. I cant say anything about depth, other than like teh explorer I believe you will need to be in manual to get the most.
Thing is most of my sites depth isnt the issue, iron is... sometimes in teh parks and yards I get over a deep one, but the cellar holes most stuff is hidden more than deep
 
and I am sure the way I had it set in multi tone it can be sused fine in iron.. I just lost all the good ID info I was used to.. I suppose they think if your relic hunting you dig every signal, and that is probably true, but with the Explorer I just liked the fact I coiuld skip teh crappy ones and move on to the ones I was sure was good.. save the crappy ones for later :) now all I got left at most sites are those crapy ones. had I taken the explorer there I doubt I would have done better, but the fact I didn't do any better with the etrac tells me the explorer must do well enough in the iron :)
 
Top