Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Omega 8000 gold rings, chains

canes12

New member
Alas, I'm sad that I can't hunt for old coins as much as you folks
up north and west. Unfortunately, the major hunt is for "beach-ing"
gold coins and chains.
So with the above BS out of the way, I'm curious as to how the
O8 handles gold jewelry. In Florida any machine that can hone
in on gold chains is a winner.
Thanks for your input.
 
In dry sand the Omega runs like a charm. There are, however, better models for wet sand. I have never found a gold chain with the Omega, but have found gold rings and 1 charm. Are you going to be wading, or just hunting the beaches? Gold chains present a problem for a good many detectors. HH jim tn
 
I haven't done much beach detecting with my Omega, but when I have (and I agree with Jim) it has performed well. I haven't found any gold chains at all with my Omega, but away from the beach (inland) I have found silver chains and gold rings. It hits well on both. HH Pete.
 
Not sure if your question was directed to me, TerraDigger, but I hunt in both disc. and all metal modes, and finds have been made with both 11"DD coil and 10" concentric. Hope this helps.
 
I have bench tested 14k 3mm curb link men's gold chain. I think 2" was best Omega could get. Its the links physical shape that makes chains notoriously difficult for most detectors to pick up at any appreciable depth. However, there are certain model detectors that do well with chains.
 
Don't get your hopes up on finding gold chains with any off the shelf multipurpose metal detector unless the chain has some type of a larger metal object attached to it.

When hunting for gold chains you have to think of it as ONE link or just the clasp, even clumped up in a pile to the detector its acts as one link, or at best a pile of tiny broken signals which is even worse.
Now if its a very large chain having large links then the detector may hit on it, but the tiny chains are just hard to find with a metal detector.
My brother "WV62" has been around and around with this problem, to only find out that metal detectors don't like gold chains.

Mark
 
Writeup From The Internet said:
It is best to think of metal detectors made for prospecting as "nugget detectors" as that is the truth of the matter.

Metal detectors are electromagnetic devices, and as such can detect items that are conductive and non-magnetic, like gold, or non-conductive but magnetic, like magnetite. Or both, like metallic iron.

When dealing with gold you are dealing only with conductivity. The more conductive the mass, the easier it is to detect. In general what this means is bigger is better. Any detector has a limit to how small an item it can detect.

Here is the kicker. Multiple undetectable targets do not add up to create a detectable target. I do not know how many times I've seen or been told of people throwing a vial of small gold on the ground and running a detector over it and declaring the detector will not find gold because it does not pick up the vial of gold.

Let us say that on a scale of 0-10 zero represents an undetectable piece of gold, and 10 one that really beeps. 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 still equals zero. So lots of tiny gold is just as undetectable as a single piece of tiny gold. You need a single conductive mass.

Fine gold usually has a coating, and putting a bunch of fine gold in a vial still results in little or no signal. If the gold is super clean and packed tightly you will get a weak signal. Melt it all together, and now it goes beep.

Another way to look at it is take some fine gold and pour it in a pile. Get a multimeter and test your little pile of gold for conductivity. It is hard to get much current if any through a loose pile of gold.

So bottom line is you might have 5 ounces of fine gold right under your feet, and you will walk right over it with your metal detector.

Jewelry hunters run into this when trying to detect lost necklaces. A fine chain is very hard to detect as each link is undetectable and the connection between the links is poor enough the signals does not add up to much. Often all you can detect is the clasp.

Now once an item is detectable, it does add up. Two large nuggets in the same spot are easier to detect than each by itself. If each link in the gold chain can be detected, then it will add up into a more detectable target.
 
Thanks for the write up, it makes alot of sense....I have found one gold chain and it was on the surface and gave a slight chatter. If I wasn't looking down at the same time the T2 chattered I would have walked right past it.
 
wonderful. I think the gold metal detector is reall excellent and can not only help us but also give us a loyt of fun. and my uncle owns one ,
 
Top