Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

PCB design - the hard work ?

A

Anonymous

Guest
Hi everyone!
On this forum many great people said a lot about
electronics (OA, pre-amps, filters, coils etc.).
But i want to ask one question:
- how design of detector's pcb influences on it's parameters (mostly sens.)?
We know that arangement of component is sometimes critical, so what are your experiences in this matter ?
 
The single most common mistake I've seen is not keeping the audio system well isolated from the preamp. This applies not only to layout, but also to circuit design.
In general, in non-microprocessed systems, my experience has been that layout is non-critical, if you use common sense esp. with respect to keeping ground runs short. Until quite recently I did most of my prototyping on perfboards without groundplane, and have never observed any improvement resulting from putting the thing onto a real PC board for production.
Some people like to spread things out, on the assumption that this reduces capacitive coupling. However, I always cram everything together as tight as possible, except sometimes I'll move a circuit block away from another circuit block. Cramming everything together reduces resistive and inductive impedance which can lead to ground loops; and, although it may not be obvious, it reduces some types of capacitive coupling as well.
If the design includes a digital subsystem with variable execution such as a microprocessor, lots of things can go wrong in the way of flicker noise on power supplies, spikes from digital signals hitting op amp outputs and causing them to ring, and capacitive coupling back into the "front end" causing ordinary electrical interference. The problems are somewhat related to those which can happen due to carelessness with audio, and circuit design is involved as well as layout.
--Dave J.
 
Dave, when you say perfboard do you mean the old style with nothing but pheonolic -no copper on the board?
 
What do you use now? I have some similar material that has a ground plane on the top and power traces conveniently routed on the bottom- would this be a better choice?
 
I don't like PC boards with power busses. They're set up for digital circuitry (2 rails) rather than the 3 rails needed by most analog circuitry; and they confine options on layout.
On projects where there was sensitive high-speed stuff I have used one-side groundplane perfboard, using the groundplane as one of the rails. The other rails can be decoupled to it as necessary with ceramic caps.
--Dave J.
 
Please do have a look at the comparison at http://www.natworld.com/ars/pages/back_issues/2000_text/1200_text/proto.html.
For analog circuits I prefer modified Manhattan - I use cyanacrylate and long stripes of laminate instead of original circles, 2mm wide, and cut the desired lenght. To add ICs - see http://www.natworld.com/ars/images/backissue_images/2000_images/1200_images/solder_mount.jpg
(my boads are much more "dense").
Regards,
pawel
 
Top