Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Pulse Width ?

Hobo lobo

New member
Can someone explain pulse width and its effect on depth and sensitivity, and why do some PI detectors have it adjustable and others do not?
 
The pulse width is the time the pulse current is on. Increase the width and the coil current will increase on many if not most coils. This will or can result in some depth increase but does so at a price. More coil current takes longer to decay so the minimum delay that one might be able to use can increase. Thus, a longer pulse width can result in increasing the depth on large objects but make it more difficult to detect the smallest gold.

Pulse width is not generally something that is adjustable on many PI's. On the GS 5, at least on some versions, one could switch between 100usec and 200 usec pulse width. The longer width may have been 250 use. I don't remember for sure. I never did see any improvement in depth with the longer pulse width but I was only testing some of the more common nuggets I have found in the past with none of them much over 1/2 oz.

Now, the 200usec width should do a little better on much larger gold and silver but would not usually will not allow the minimum delay to work on some coils that would work on the 100 usec setting.

So, part of the decision of what would be a single setting if there were no pulse width control was determined by what was to be the primary reason for the detector. For gold, generally, 100usec worked fine. Actually, 50 usec worked great for really small gold because it would allow for a little shorter delay to be used. However, one could see some depth loss on larger targets, so the 100 usec setting is a good compromise and is common on detectors such as the TDI.

Reg
 
Adjustable pulse delay is something else. Many PI's have this control. Pulse delay simply delays when the sample is taken after the pulse is turned off. A short delay gives the strongest response and best for small gold. Advance the delay and small objects can be ignored including small gold. When coin hunting with the TDI, turning up the delay some will cause the detector to ignore tin foil, thus eliminating signals that may help mask deeper targets.

Certain metals require a short delay if the object is small. Other metals such as copper and silver are usually detected well even with a large delay.

Reg
 
Reg,............. I meant to say the Sand Shark has a adj. pulse width, the delay is fixed......................HL
 
Reg what would be the typical sample pulse width of the (two) sample pulses after the main TX pulse ?
for what we are discussing here ?

thanks
 
Top