Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Quick Comparison - Ace 150 vs 250

Ralph Bryant

New member
Received the Ace 250 this morning, and thought I would do a quick comparison between the two just to see if there was really any difference in basic performance capabilities.

Well, they are pretty darn close. The 250 does have a noticeably higher gain range that gives it a slight edge, but it's not by much. Here are some basic air tests with both the 4.5 Sniper coil and the stock 6.5x9 on each machine:

<center>[attachment 16220 Ace150250AirTests.JPG]</center>

While the stock 6.5x9 coil is solidly built and works well overall, I think the 4.5 Sniper coil really makes these machines something special, if for no other reasons than these:

1. No pinpointing concerns with the smaller coil. Target signal is at the center in either lateral or heel-to-toe direction. No second guessing.

2. No concerns with how high you set your sensitivity in most instances, since the smaller coil allows higher settings without as much exposure to external RF interferrence or the larger surface area of ground mineralization detected with the larger coils.

3. A smaller coil concentrates the electromagnetic field of the coil, allowing for better sensitivity to smaller targets and targets at fringe depths or on the edge of notched discrimination ranges.

4. Very little concern with target masking, and the ability to get very close to metal obsticles by adjusting to the required sensitivity level. Very tight target separation.

5. The smaller coil size almost forces you to SLOW DOWN AND LOOK CLOSER.

6. Provides for a much lighter weight and better balanced machine overall. Very little fatigue involved.

7. (I like this one ! :)) Those little coils make the "BIG GUYS" think you are using a toy, so they don't take your seriously. BIG MISTAKE !

All of these reasons make a smaller coil a good learning tool for kids to, as it helps teach them coil discipline, pinpointing, target sizing, and so on.

As an example of number 3 above, I did some testing with a new nickel on the 250 and noticed that in the coin mode, the new coin would break up and jump between the nickel icon and the next higher closed notch (low pull-tab) giving it a very questionable broken signal. In the same mode, but using the 4.5 coil, the same coin, same location, same detector settings produced a much stronger "no-questions" nickel signal. This was not really a problem on higher-end coin range signals or when the notches either side of the nickel notch were opened up on the 250, just something that helps to show the differences between coils and how the more concentrated EMF of the small coil can provide some benefit. The same thing is not even an issue with the 150 because of it's wider individual notching ranges, and in some regards the simplicity of the 150 can have it's advantages.

Still finding very little NOT to like about these machines, from construction quality to features and performance. They won't be replacing my other favorites, but they will definately be adding to them.

Ralph
 
Good test and comments. I guess my hunch about them
being pretty close as far as depth wasn't too far off.
I didn't think they would be too far apart. I still
plan to order both extra coils pretty soon.
MK
 
...as usual. You're winning me over to the "Snipers Way", boy!

Thanks for your work, it's appreciated.
 
Ralph, That was a very good comparison report,well said!

I think I am just about convinced on buying the Ace 250, after all the good reviews.
Thanks for sharing your experience.

HH,Bernie
 
Nice test Ralph. I always look at the sniper coils like the pinpoint receiving coil on a larger coil. Not much you can miss with them. As you say, the 250 has a slight edge but not much.

Bill
 
...talk about your comparison shoppers!
"I think I am just about convinced on buying the Ace 250".

Oh, dear friend, wait not another moment for fortune to lay it's gilt glove in yours.

Buy one and get to the fun stuff, bud. You wont regret it.
 
And you have me convinced on buying one also.
My Prizm V can't match that even.
Don't get me wrong I like the Prizm V, but the Ace 250 will be my next machine soon
How much I use the Prizm after that only time will tell..

THANK YOU FOR THIS REPORT

Bruce
 
Dont dump the Prizm, just yet, but it wont substantialy beat the Ace in performance and will be hardly as much fun to swing, tote or look at!

Keep in mind that the Ace functions differently than the Whites, so let it have it's time to get to know you.
 
:clapping:thank you for that report.Got the ace 250 yeller feller and a bonus from my son the sniper coil at xmas.:thumbup:The "Famiglia" now know that at father's day i get the other coil 12" and the collection will be completed.:rofl:Guess where the OLD man will be this spring:hot: Ciao.Anthony
 
Hi Ralph, Just curious...What method do you use
when air testing? The reason I ask, is I tried a
quicky air test with mine, and I don't seem to get
quite the depth you are seeing. I'm wondering if maybe
it's the air test technique itself.. Do you lay the
detector still and pass the coin in front of the coil,
or are you laying the coil down on something like a box,
and detecting, etc..? I notice you show appx 9 inches
on the clad quarter. On mine , I'm lucky to get it to
fire at 7-8 inches in the air..
I'm not having any trouble really, but makes me wonder
if maybe the things can be tuned or tweaked up a bit
in the detect mode. But..Maybe it's the air test method
I'm using.. How are you doing those tests?
BTW..A friend just came by a while ago. He asked about
yeller feller, so I brought it out so he could see it.
I plopped in on the ground in the front yard, and
found two clad quarters one after another in about two
minutes time. He was fairly impressed, and sez he wants
to get one now.. :)
MK
 
You know what I'll be ordering then.
The wife says no detector goes on this vacation....
Don't plan on letting the Prizm go, and yes to get use to any detector you have to give it some time...

Thanks guys....

Usually I don't start my first hunt till April 3rd anyway...
 
...Are usually done with SENS set at max, or as absolutely as wide open as one can go without falsing. The feeling is that you get a full scale reaction from the circuits when run wide open. Unfortunately, you can rarely run at max settings when afield. Then, too, at those settings, interference from lights, wiring, and so on can possibly come into play and skew your results.

Air tests are just that, tests in air. While it is true that, "if you cant air test it, you sure cant find it in the ground" - they are little more than an indicator, good mostly for comparison. I dont knock them and I do them, too, but I think I have a better way.

I like to use a concrete slab floor to test on. One without reinforcing rod or wire mesh, mind you. :happy: Such floors are usually reinforced with quartz or igneous gravels and tend to be mineralized just slightly negative - more of a real world matrix than vacuous air.

But that's just me. Air test if you like - we, as men are wired to look for quantifiables and absolutes. But know that they are imperfect and for comparison only. What works for one may not work for you.
 
I did the "air-tests" indoors with the machines arm cup stand area sitting on a table, and the search rod lying over the back of a chair so that the coils would be well away from any metal. All settings were wide open max. Targets are then started at a distance, making sure you have the flat side of the coin toward the coil, and approaching the coil until you get your first double (two-way) signal and making note of the distance using a plastic or wooden ruler with no metal reinforcement.

Remember that air-tests are good for comparisons of like machines and for diagnosing possible problems, but are nothing compared to real-world "in the ground" results. Some ground conditions might give you a little edge, while others will substantially take away from these results. These particular tests were just to get an indication on how much potential performance difference there was between the 150 and 250. Your mileage may vary......

Ralph
 
I tested them at a pretty fast clip like I do with most two-filter machines. I haven't quite decided if you get more depth with a fast swing, or just less depth with a slow one....... :lol:

Ralph
 
Top