moseng
Member
Only been detecting for a short while but hey, I'm hooked what can I say. I am using an ACE 250 now and while I am finding stuff (hence the reason I am hooked), every swing while fun has got me thinking that there might be something there deeper than this thing can't see or recongnize. Not to mention it would be nice if I could be more certain that it's a coin or a ring instead of a bottle cap or
you know?
So.. Thinking about getting a Minelab but am wondering what the difference is between the 3 FBS machines and if they will make any difference (to me at least). I mean I read the specs but not exactly sure why I would want the added features of one over the other. Are they just nice to have or is it a case of more tools in the arsenal kinda thing? If the later, then which ones would "I" use? I want to mostly hunt for "old" sutff like coins, jewelry, and perhaps some gold since I live in gold country (California). Although I do intend to hang out a bit in Europe this year which will be nice for that old stuff I was referring to.
So my questions are...
1. What features (in your opinion) might I miss (or soon want) if I were to go with the bottom of the FBS line, Safari?
2. Is the depth these 3 can go the same, or is there a difference and why?
3. Is the processor used the same in them? If not what is in the Safari because I can't seem to find this.
I appreciate any insight you might have as well. Thanks!

So.. Thinking about getting a Minelab but am wondering what the difference is between the 3 FBS machines and if they will make any difference (to me at least). I mean I read the specs but not exactly sure why I would want the added features of one over the other. Are they just nice to have or is it a case of more tools in the arsenal kinda thing? If the later, then which ones would "I" use? I want to mostly hunt for "old" sutff like coins, jewelry, and perhaps some gold since I live in gold country (California). Although I do intend to hang out a bit in Europe this year which will be nice for that old stuff I was referring to.
So my questions are...
1. What features (in your opinion) might I miss (or soon want) if I were to go with the bottom of the FBS line, Safari?
2. Is the depth these 3 can go the same, or is there a difference and why?
3. Is the processor used the same in them? If not what is in the Safari because I can't seem to find this.
I appreciate any insight you might have as well. Thanks!