Does your SE seem to take longer to noise cancel than your EX II does?
I have had several EX II in the past and I just don't remember them taking as long as the SE. I think if there is any problem with the SE it make be it's ability to find a clear set of channels. I have noticed that I make have to run the noise cancel a few times before it works good. I have turned down the sensivity, around 15, done a noise cancel, and then turned the sens back up. This seems to works ok.
So Larry based on what you are doing and what I am seeing I just wonder if that's the deal with the SE...just a little trouble at finding a clear channel.
I do know it's one heck of a detector. About an hour ago I took it out in my front yard. I got a nice repeatable signal at about 4 inches. The numbers were jumping around a little but not much. I went inside and got my MXT. In coin mode it would barely see the signal. In relic mode it did a little better. In any case I would have not found it with the MXT unless I knew where it was first. The I went and got my CZ5. It gave off a weak repeatable signal but nothing like the SE. I have 6 detectors but decided to stop there and see what the signal was. It turned out to be a highly corroded dime on edge at about 5 inches. Pretty cool if you ask me that the SE picked it out so well.
As far as SE problems..I think they may need to take a look at the noise cancel function. It just doesn't seem to work as good as the EX II.
What do you think?
Harold